Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-click-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37209 invoked from network); 18 May 2009 12:00:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 May 2009 12:00:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 90206 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2009 12:00:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-click-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 90179 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2009 12:00:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact click-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: click-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list click-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 90171 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2009 12:00:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 12:00:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of malcolm.edgar@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.145 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.145] (HELO qw-out-1920.google.com) (74.125.92.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 12:00:18 +0000 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 9so2278781qwj.54 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 04:59:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FKLXF9zHO8qLCDWNpkJTw3RCt7E/jw2LITY6TQWTmHI=; b=fJk7DUd3zY5/yfYz+z3dSRwhloW7TrQi2kel23RTWSMdJzC/9ZdvdebrpoUgfhG9ds j+l9PtUsxAnReIoA0HoKf3Ek4I+sR42byD4dGQ3YUXIjXzinfySYmQpGaz4+/dX+cH3x QlEguwWpa/u/c0HlsJi0dCGZB4cfB3y7kAySU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Zx5j0WUP09McwwpIVlQh7AbplsMrQjwrlBoaFZ5f+uMWPi8MXkGMajpChNhSzej6sr Ruiof7s4PeXb1RYtHWtyea5jc1My2pqLnkVeC2bXYcxqVVGTQcKSav+xmNAL27JujU32 PvU+iVCRHkh3ULhUt2Jmoe/UwpXsz3wS+p/OY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.74.2 with SMTP id s2mr2136922vcj.37.1242647998059; Mon, 18 May 2009 04:59:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <525d8e10905180436n72ef810cn23ab0c92b94adbf2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:59:58 +1000 Message-ID: <525d8e10905180459t4c16b54g557efa20438e6f16@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Click 2.1.0 release date? From: Malcolm Edgar To: click-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Click didn't progress through to a TLP yet as feedback from the Apache was that the community needed to be bigger. So we will try again in a few months time. In the mean time we need to increase the visibility of the framework. I think a good way of doing this is through a release, and promotion and some articles. If we don't time box the 2.1.0 release date, it can drag on forever. regards Malcolm Edgar On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Adrian A. wrote: >> What do people think about targeting the end of May as the release >> date for Apache Click 2.1.0 ? > > I would rather see the many issues standing out to be solved first, and only > after to do a release (otherwise the difference between patches and trunk > will be bigger and bigger each day). > > Also, since the voting of moving click to TLP was done, it would be much > nicer if Click 2.1.0 would be released that way (without the incubator tag). > >