click-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bob Schellink <sab...@gmail.com>
Subject ClickIDE release
Date Mon, 18 May 2009 16:26:30 GMT
We also need to look at releasing ClickIDE. I assume we go through the 
same procedure for releasing a subproject?

bob


Malcolm Edgar wrote:
> Yes an RC would probably be good, with a code feature freeze after
> that. So it 2.1.0 doesn't drag out.
> 
> regards Malcolm
> 
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Bob Schellink <sabob1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Agreed, lets get 2.1.0 out. Probably a RC?
>>
>> On 5/18/09, Malcolm Edgar <malcolm.edgar@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Click didn't progress through to a TLP yet as feedback from the Apache
>>> was that the community needed to be bigger. So we will try again in a
>>> few months time.
>>>
>>> In the mean time we need to increase the visibility of the framework.
>>> I think a good way of doing this is through a release, and promotion
>>> and some articles.
>>>
>>> If we don't time box the 2.1.0 release date, it can drag on forever.
>>>
>>> regards Malcolm Edgar
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Adrian A. <a.adrian.tech@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> What do people think about targeting the end of May as the release
>>>>> date for Apache Click 2.1.0 ?
>>>> I would rather see the many issues standing out to be solved first, and
>>>> only
>>>> after to do a release (otherwise the difference between patches and trunk
>>>> will be bigger and bigger each day).
>>>>
>>>> Also, since the voting of moving click to TLP was done, it would be much
>>>> nicer if Click 2.1.0 would be released that way (without the incubator
>>>> tag).
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> http://incubator.apache.org/click/
>>
> 


Mime
View raw message