click-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bob Schellink <sab...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (CLK-505) Update to Cayenne 3.0M5
Date Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:52:31 GMT
Adrian A. (JIRA) wrote:
> 
> Adrian A. commented on CLK-505:
> -------------------------------
> 
> I think this is just a standard at Cayenne : it is Milestone forever. It was so with
2.x too, but each milestone was very stable compared to many other "declared final" projects
:).


I hear you, however the Cayenne team would have no obligation to fix a 
critical bug in M5 vs one in 2.0.x. That is why I think its risky for 
us to declare Click 2.1.0 stable but ship it with alpha software (even 
with the Cayenne's stable history).


> Maybe this is a good thing. Click could use some of the "new" JDK features.


Yes we should consider going JDK5 (if Cayenne 3.0 final is released 
that plays our hand anyway) however personally I don't see many 
advantages for Click users. We could add annotations here and there 
however we need to see if pros outweigh the cons.


> That's why SVN has branches :).
> 
> I would volunteer to help :).


Well the first thing to check is if M5 works with Click Cayenne 
support by replacing the 2.0.x jar with M5. If it does work then the 
only changes needed would be to the documentation, build.xml and poms.

If M5 doesn't work then we'll need patches for the Cayenne support 
classes.

You can attach the patches to the JIRA and we can include it when we 
upgrade.


> P.S.
> It looks like the mailing list <=> JIRA sync is not working. Your comment didn't
appeared in JIRA.
> In the old installation it was working correctly.


You mean the Avoka JIRA or the lonestanding Click JIRA at Apache?

regards

bob


Mime
View raw message