click-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrus Adamchik <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Click 2.0.1 release
Date Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:21:07 GMT
Just did a quick evaluation. Haven't looked at the technical aspects,  
but rather the compliance issues.

I noticed one minor thing that we'd rather fix before posting the  
release for the Incubator PMC vote: while  
correctly uses "incubating" label, inside the archive, folder name is  
just "click-2.0.1", so when a user unpacks the archive, "incubating"  
label disappears:

~/opt: unzip -l  |head
   Length     Date   Time    Name
  --------    ----   ----    ----
         0  01-25-09 00:54   click-2.0.1/
         0  01-25-09 00:54   click-2.0.1/build/
         0  01-25-09 00:54   click-2.0.1/dist/
         0  01-25-09 00:54   click-2.0.1/documentation/
         0  01-25-09 00:54   click-2.0.1/documentation/docs/

I'd say this needs to be fixed as it unintentionally circumvents the  
intent of the "incubating" label. Don't think there's a hard rule  
regarding this, but I suggest we stay on the safe side.

Another small thing, that would not affect my vote, still I figured  
I'd mention. NOTICE.txt file has this note for a number of JS  
libraries: "Please note this library is NOT included in the Click  
runtime library." IMO what's important here is which library is  
included in the *distribution zip* (not the runtime). In this case, at  
least Rico and YUI are a part of the examples:


The license of these libs is compatible with Apache, so there's no  
problem including them. But the corresponding notes in the NOTICE.txt  
should probably be taken out.


On Jan 25, 2009, at 1:43 AM, Bob Schellink wrote:

> Hi all,
> I've prepared the Click 2.0.1 distribution which is available here:
> Please cast your vote for publishing this release.
> The voting period is 72 hours and closes at 12am GMT on Wed, 28th.
> Here is my +1.
> kind regards
> bob

View raw message