Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-click-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 13436 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2008 17:06:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2008 17:06:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 62312 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2008 17:06:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-click-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62296 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2008 17:06:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact click-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: click-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list click-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for click-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30646 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2008 16:45:56 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mhall@polk.net designates 24.227.64.77 as permitted sender) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:45:26 -0400 From: Mhall Reply-To: mhall@lakeland.net To: click-development , click-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Click-development] JSP forwarding issues Message-ID: <69819e3c3ec712cbd67be1a9bf945086@polk.net> X-Mailer: IceWarp Web Mail 5.6.6 X-Originating-IP: 159.53.46.143 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Regardless of how we do it (RequestDispatcher or direct) I am just not > sure we second guess the user when they forward or redirect to a jsp > page. As nobody has raised an issue about this, perhaps the current > behavior is correct? > > In fact the one issue that was raised seemed to indicate that redirect > should not convert from jsp to htm. > If that is an option, that would be my vote. Click should introduce as little magic as possible.