Mailing-List: contact click-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: click-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sabob1@gmail.com designates
 64.233.166.181 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=YQh+siZOaIPKxGX68noAx45XsJq0wSeCsFpOnl00xxZE2VhNL81St7N3EORKdnCcgf
         yRPkEewRqHYDTXEgVqkCnC4WEGOm2STj8VbS+Puj7ODhDCfFIMLAXpPI6Kgv+nDqD/Yd
         YH9U8B0zrNgiOHh5j6MvkhebKtDvQHjWOY/uY=
Message-ID: <48B2DD16.3010803@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:25:58 +0200
From: Bob Schellink <sabob1@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: click-development <click-development@lists.sourceforge.net>,
 click-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: JSP forwarding issues
References: <48B1A304.1060806@gmail.com>
	<21bdcc640808241338q212db36fj1faaaf0043a41b81@mail.gmail.com>
	<48B1C9E7.9030208@gmail.com>
 <21bdcc640808241701j3715aedfo7f87f08e6c9e9924@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <21bdcc640808241701j3715aedfo7f87f08e6c9e9924@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Michael Hall wrote:
> 
> How about making Page.setForward bypass 
> HttpServletRequest#getRequestDispatcher if Context#getPageClass finds a 
> matching page class.  If the intention is to run the Page class for the 
> path, can we do that directly in Click without falling back to the 
> Servlet mechanisms?


Interesting approach. One to thing to watch out for here is that 
filters will be bypassed.

Regardless of how we do it (RequestDispatcher or direct) I am just not 
sure we second guess the user when they forward or redirect to a jsp 
page. As nobody has raised an issue about this, perhaps the current 
behavior is correct?

In fact the one issue that was raised seemed to indicate that redirect 
should not convert from jsp to htm.