Mailing-List: contact chukwa-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: chukwa-user@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of asrabkin@gmail.com designates
 209.85.221.193 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=b2b0doauOUbxewkGgGbl1YCN/9W4+6KOANErF/DsSxJdcwmVx6BnMTbz9OQ+DKiouY
         HM2Z7NpmtNc6aUJhzHjygf8e8Evehy09Pnqy3aWL6RWN3mpZ0AtFYj+14OXd1Cu3Fpn0
         sjnOd8x8Mo3Sb8S00IZ4ICgEuPB5kRwFvOmDE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C7E35693.785A%eyang@yahoo-inc.com>
References: <C7E35693.785A%eyang@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 10:04:58 -0700
Message-ID: <l2u39b0afc01004081004z7dfeaefcz678ec513a4a76033@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Begin a discussion about Chukwa as a top level project
From: Ariel Rabkin <asrabkin@gmail.com>
To: chukwa-user@hadoop.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Eric Yang <eyang@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:


> I see three ways that we as a community can respond to this:
>
> 1) Say yes, we want to be a TLP now.
>
> 2) Say yes, we want to be a TLP, but not yet. We feel we need more
> time to mature. If we choose this option we need to be able to clearly
> articulate how much time we need and what we hope to see change in
> that time.
>
> 3) Say no, we feel the benefits for us staying with Hadoop outweigh
> the drawbacks of being a disjoint subproject. If we choose this, we
> need to be able to say exactly what those benefits are and why we feel
> they will be compromised by leaving the Hadoop project.

I'm okay with any of these, and I guess lean towards 1.  I don't see
any huge benefit in #2 or #3 over #1.

--Ari

-- 
Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com
UC Berkeley Computer Science Department