Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-chukwa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-chukwa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E94410F79 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 01:23:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23930 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2013 01:23:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-chukwa-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23912 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2013 01:23:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact chukwa-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: chukwa-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list chukwa-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23904 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2013 01:23:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 01:23:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of luckbr1975@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.45] (HELO mail-pa0-f45.google.com) (209.85.220.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 01:23:36 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id bg4so3166415pad.32 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:23:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=sJpNEX/ijqlAtmjndyc1A5RmhADhUflRLALyV9hxc78=; b=nzdnIo4iosqRHX9JOYsNx/7lAk5NZh/dvWUkpbjdGm1sZnsTru2u57GMNkS6vgs4NH 0ETzbNjYP1JX2wXJ6pmqEQ/25uwFdBdZbC0irXdFUrAKsxrI5N8K0CWmIY1CSNmclq9G JxgSwE9a2WW0uU11pMoYSS+w1OtH0JRc61DzMBl5XTd4VryYyxBtUFLwE0Tc9HapD7Sw epF+kpqYXRmU5EehCBrkgLyLyiMHpjJFLsNftildSktSvYGwCJiPS1+cal+8DDk75t5l O99Q9O8yawqFjL9dDzUUh/G79k8ivN7rLbh287p/6L70a8f/hPtl3s4HhYepupb602lL oocQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.67.23.36 with SMTP id hx4mr18625800pad.54.1379121795749; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.19.233 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:23:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:23:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: binary release artifacts From: Luciano Resende To: chukwa-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b072450bce02304e64dd0b5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b072450bce02304e64dd0b5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Tim Williams wrote: > Hi Eric, > I've included references inline for your convenience. I'll once again > [strongly] suggest you guys remove that artifact. > > Thanks, > --tim > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Eric Yang wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > > > There is LICENSE.txt and NOTICES.txt in both source and binary package. > In > > the binary package, the files are located in $PREFIX/share/doc/chukwa to > > match what standard Linux file system layout. We voted for source > release > > and there is no Apache restriction that a source release, can not > procedure > > a binary package. > > "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority > approval -- i.e., at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively > for release, and there must be more positive than negative votes." > > Each vote is on signed, hashed artifacts, so yes, if you say it's a > "source vote" then no binary should accompany it. > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > > There is also no restriction that binary release must > > have LICENSE.txt and NOTICES.txt in the top level directory. > > How do you reach that understanding from the sentence below? > > "Every Apache distribution should include a NOTICE file in the top > directory, along with the standard LICENSE file." > > http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Tim Williams > wrote: > > > >> Maybe my subscription was confirmed yet the first time I sent this... > >> > >> > >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >> > >> Hi Chukwa devs, > >> I noticed you have a binary convenience artifact in the release > >> location[1] that doesn't have a LICENSE or a NOTICE in it. In looking > >> back at the release vote[2][3], it seems like you chose to only vote a > >> source release (admittedly easier). > >> > >> You can't vote on a source-only release and then also release the > >> binary artifact. I think you guys should remove the binary from dist. > >> > >> Then, there's the potential that I'm missing something here, in which > >> case, I'd appreciate an explanation:) > >> > >> Thanks, > >> --tim > >> > >> [1] - http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/chukwa/chukwa-0.5.0/ > >> [2] - > >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-chukwa-dev/201201.mbox/%3CCADfbTpHnVv5gm9UxewmTt377VpUZHzaLG%3D37mNoxXbj%3D6QTBwQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > >> > >> [3] - > >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-chukwa-dev/201201.mbox/%3CCADfbTpEZfsDqF%2BuS2r8pqQYF%3DyEoj_gOcR8U-ptUeQHOsUdFNg%40mail.gmail.com%3E > >> > +1, only artifacts reviewed and approved by votes should be distributed as a release. If a release is providing a source tarball, binary tarball, and maven binaries, then all these should be reviewed and voted as part of the release, otherwise they should not be distributed. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --047d7b072450bce02304e64dd0b5--