chukwa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jerome Boulon <jbou...@netflix.com>
Subject Re: which issues are blockers for 0.4?
Date Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:57:55 GMT
Hi everyone,
I will not be able to release my stuff since I had to switch to something
else for the last month.

Could we have a sync on who/how chukwa is used today?

/Jerome.

On 1/19/10 12:41 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <asrabkin@gmail.com> wrote:

> So let's see.  We have a patch for 440, that looks ready to go.
> How are 444 and 442 going?
> 
> I can document the SocketTeeWriter.
> 
> I'd like to do something about CHUKWA-447 -- metrics being too
> expensive to collect -- but I don't quite know what the fix is.
> 
> Also, we should address CHUKWA-446 -- the scripts -- and update
> documentation accordingly.
> 
> --Ari
> 
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Eric Yang <eyang@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ari,
>> 
>> I vote to fix CHUKWA-440 for 0.4.  CHUKWA-444 and CHUKWA-422 are nice to
>> have, but they might not be feature complete by February.
>> 
>> HICC REST API, SocketTeeWriter and Socket Data Loader framework should be
>> added in 0.4 documentation.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Eric
>> 
>> On 12/30/09 2:44 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <asrabkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all.
>>> 
>>> I think it's time to start thinking about releasing 0.4. We have a
>>> fair number of accumulated new features and bug fixes.  Version 0.3
>>> came out in November, so I think we might reasonably target a branch
>>> date of Feb 1 for 0.4.   How's that sound?  I think there have been
>>> enough improvements since 0.3 to justify the release.
>>> 
>>> --Ari
>> 
>> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message