chukwa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jiaqi Tan <tanji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: rolling a 0.3 release?
Date Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:27:32 GMT
Is there any way we can mark out only the log collection changes for
0.3 release, and "freeze" HICC at the last point where it was working?

Jiaqi

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Ariel Rabkin <asrabkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> I dissent.  I think robust log collection, is an important application
> in its own right, particularly log collection that makes the data
> MapReduceable.  A release with log collection but not HICC would be
> much better than no release.
>
> Is there harm in doing a release without HICC, or without a working HICC?
>
> --Ari
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Jiaqi Tan <tanjiaqi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I second Eric on that, without HICC there's only the back-end data
>> collection which I believe would not be as useful.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jiaqi
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Eric Yang <eyang@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>>> Hicc is currently broken.  The "create dashboard" feature is broken due to
>>> incompatible Jasper.runtime.ELContextImpl bundled in Apache taglib and
>>> jetty-jsp api.  I have a working solution to remove apache taglib from Hicc
>>> code, and going with pure REST & serve HICC views from HDFS.  I need at
>>> least 3 more weekends to complete this.  I think it's better that we put off
>>> the 0.3 release and go with 0.4.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Eric
>>>
>>> On 9/29/09 10:39 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <asrabkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hrm.  Are there other features on the horizon that are worth waiting
>>>> for?  Even without SALSA, Chukwa supplies useful functionality and I
>>>> think it's worth getting something out there.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sort of inclined to do a 0.3 release without SALSA, and then a 0.4
>>>> whenever SALSA  is ready to go. A 0.4 release could also include a
>>>> number of other improvements -- there are things I want to do over the
>>>> coming months, and I suspect Jerome is also implementing things.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> --Ari
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Jiaqi Tan <tanjiaqi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> We're still missing a subclass of the AbstractDataProcessor for fully
>>>>> automating the end-to-end process of converting post-Demux output to
>>>>> state-machine entries for SALSA processing, but I don't see myself
>>>>> finishing that for at least a month. I would commit some of the
>>>>> command-line tools with documentation on how to get the end-to-end
>>>>> process done manually as a stop-gap, I can change those JIRAs to
>>>>> blockers for 0.3 and I can get those done in a week or two.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jiaqi
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Ariel Rabkin <asrabkin@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>> Howdy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How does everybody feel about making a formal release of 0.3 ? I
can't
>>>>>> get to it until next week, but I think we could do it then. The
>>>>>> current SVN trunk is stable, reasonably well documented and fairly
>>>>>> well tested. Are there blockers for release that aren't listed on
>>>>>> JIRA?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Ari
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com
>>>>>> UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com
> UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
>

Mime
View raw message