chukwa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jerome Boulon <jbou...@netflix.com>
Subject Re: rolling a 0.3 release?
Date Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:11:03 GMT
Eric, do you know which update/patch broke HICC?
/Jerome.

On 10/1/09 12:27 AM, "Jiaqi Tan" <tanjiaqi@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is there any way we can mark out only the log collection changes for
> 0.3 release, and "freeze" HICC at the last point where it was working?
> 
> Jiaqi
> 
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Ariel Rabkin <asrabkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I dissent.  I think robust log collection, is an important application
>> in its own right, particularly log collection that makes the data
>> MapReduceable.  A release with log collection but not HICC would be
>> much better than no release.
>> 
>> Is there harm in doing a release without HICC, or without a working HICC?
>> 
>> --Ari
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Jiaqi Tan <tanjiaqi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I second Eric on that, without HICC there's only the back-end data
>>> collection which I believe would not be as useful.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Jiaqi
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Eric Yang <eyang@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>>>> Hicc is currently broken.  The "create dashboard" feature is broken due
to
>>>> incompatible Jasper.runtime.ELContextImpl bundled in Apache taglib and
>>>> jetty-jsp api.  I have a working solution to remove apache taglib from Hicc
>>>> code, and going with pure REST & serve HICC views from HDFS.  I need
at
>>>> least 3 more weekends to complete this.  I think it's better that we put
>>>> off
>>>> the 0.3 release and go with 0.4.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Eric
>>>> 
>>>> On 9/29/09 10:39 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <asrabkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hrm.  Are there other features on the horizon that are worth waiting
>>>>> for?  Even without SALSA, Chukwa supplies useful functionality and I
>>>>> think it's worth getting something out there.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm sort of inclined to do a 0.3 release without SALSA, and then a 0.4
>>>>> whenever SALSA  is ready to go. A 0.4 release could also include a
>>>>> number of other improvements -- there are things I want to do over the
>>>>> coming months, and I suspect Jerome is also implementing things.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> 
>>>>> --Ari
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Jiaqi Tan <tanjiaqi@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>> We're still missing a subclass of the AbstractDataProcessor for fully
>>>>>> automating the end-to-end process of converting post-Demux output
to
>>>>>> state-machine entries for SALSA processing, but I don't see myself
>>>>>> finishing that for at least a month. I would commit some of the
>>>>>> command-line tools with documentation on how to get the end-to-end
>>>>>> process done manually as a stop-gap, I can change those JIRAs to
>>>>>> blockers for 0.3 and I can get those done in a week or two.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jiaqi
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Ariel Rabkin <asrabkin@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Howdy.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> How does everybody feel about making a formal release of 0.3
? I can't
>>>>>>> get to it until next week, but I think we could do it then. The
>>>>>>> current SVN trunk is stable, reasonably well documented and fairly
>>>>>>> well tested. Are there blockers for release that aren't listed
on
>>>>>>> JIRA?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --Ari
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com
>>>>>>> UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com
>> UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
>> 


Mime
View raw message