chukwa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ari Rabkin (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CHUKWA-35) Should we tell JIRA about subcomponents?
Date Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:29:50 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHUKWA-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12680658#action_12680658
] 

Ari Rabkin commented on CHUKWA-35:
----------------------------------

Hrm.  I think we might be better off with fewer. I would merge agent,adaptor, and sender.
 And likewise would merge demux framework and parser.

However, we do need a category for "build system/libraries" and perhaps also for JIRA/Hudson.

> Should we tell JIRA about subcomponents?
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CHUKWA-35
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHUKWA-35
>             Project: Hadoop Chukwa
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ari Rabkin
>            Priority: Minor
>
> It might make sense to define a handful of subcomponents for Chukwa, in order to categorize
issues.  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message