Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-chemistry-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-chemistry-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C04E611DA3 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6114 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2014 14:25:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-chemistry-dev-archive@chemistry.apache.org Received: (qmail 6056 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2014 14:25:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@chemistry.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@chemistry.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@chemistry.apache.org Received: (qmail 6039 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2014 14:25:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:25:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of columbro@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.49] (HELO mail-qg0-f49.google.com) (209.85.192.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:25:03 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id j107so2244862qga.22 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 07:25:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=i1gKXMrXxy+OqLCsZN8bcrcyhjZV1uuQ7Tk7/Y0w98Q=; b=ncu8pAoA0sMI/855/fxhORdZQmVbU9j30MNj5oDDCT+Flif1jKO4z8PVt1G0jVGVSR MN0Tqubw7bQzC27ls0+5Pg2hB7r6lQBUpJvwujzcHNStSq9jdfc5TdVT5d8V+6UlzUIv AJjmkJuECRR1BJjge3HOkKIIYEwtkUDO9vEVI3uCt0yIhwFecniBHb0q2cv2EKcicRGI YHNqBahobIOynCWj9pqtK1zn7x7O/t2QBRseoIw6VlOndqQbDA8/6vLRga+atm4HSPoO DeLhKVg1wFSZF0TYCcyzxFFLQ5IirctYZ6whhEqa8AdgHl5Rfad1u/PGdN2MdJ9LT09a R8dg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.103.75 with SMTP id x69mr22839485qge.17.1408112702616; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 07:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.18.244 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 07:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 10:25:02 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: OpenCMIS next version (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS 0.12.0 (RC1)) From: Gabriele Columbro To: "dev@chemistry.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c17ab6717f240500abc9c9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c17ab6717f240500abc9c9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 OpenCMIS version 0.13.0 created. Nevertheless I'd like to discuss whether the next version should actually be (finally) the 1.0. WDYT? Gab On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Florent Guillaume wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Gabriele Columbro > wrote: > > *NOTE: *Since there was no 0.12.0 version in Jira, I created it and I > > assumed that all the issues that had (fixVersion = 1.0.0 && resolution = > > fixed) would actually be already fixed by this 0.12.0 release. Let me > know > > if this is a wrong assumption. > > That's good. You can also create 0.13.0 at the same time, as it will > be needed soon. > > > [ ] +1 Release packages as Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS 0.12.0 > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > +1 > > Florent > > > -- > Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo > Open Source Content Management Platform for Business Apps > http://www.nuxeo.com http://community.nuxeo.com > -- Gabriele Columbro Alfresco Software @mindthegabz http://mindthegab.com 404-432-7652 --001a11c17ab6717f240500abc9c9--