chemistry-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Guendisch, Dieter" <dieter.guendi...@sap.com>
Subject Re: DotCMIS funciton perfomance
Date Tue, 15 Apr 2014 20:37:13 GMT
Just out of curiosity: why did you expect DotCMIS to perform better than
OpenCMIS?
(Even though I expect OpenCMIS to have more optimisations than DotCMIS, I
would have expected the JVM to have way more years of optimisations than
the .net stackŠ)

Regards,
Dieter

On 15/04/14 21:25, "Tetsunori Inada" <inadat@ca.objectiflune.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I've done some function performance comparisons between OpenCMIS 0.10.0
>and DotCMIS 0.6.0.
>Even though I was expecting that DotCMIS would perform better than
>OpenCMIS, I found that functions/methods like CheckOut() and CheckIn()
>take about 50% to 100% longer to process with DotCMIS.
>For instance, for updating a same document:
>CheckOut(): 350ms for OpenCMIS and 770ms for DotCMIS
>CheckIn(): 434ms for OpenCMIS and 619ms for DotCMIS
>(Each process time may differ but roughly the ratios are consistent.)
>
>Is it normal to have such much slower performance with DotCMIS?
>And is there any chance that DotCMIS can outperform OpenCMIS with any
>future releases?
>
>Best regards,
>
>Tetsunori Inada
>OBJECTIF LUNE
>Product Integrator
>Int├ęgrateur de produits
>T +1 514 875 5863 x643
>inadat@ca.objectiflune.com<mailto:inadat@ca.objectiflune.com> |
>www.objectiflune.com <http://www.objectiflune.com/>


Mime
View raw message