chemistry-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gross, Lukas" <lukas.gr...@sap.com>
Subject Re: Commits to ObjectiveCMIS
Date Thu, 03 Apr 2014 12:29:49 GMT
Hi Gavin,

I'm preparing the release right now.
So this is the last call for anyone who want's to suspend the release…

Best regards,
Lukas

On 4/1/14 11:19 AM, "Gavin Cornwell" <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com> wrote:

>Hi Lukas,
>
>As you probably saw I committed the extra fixes last night so I think
>we’re now all set for the 0.3 release.
>
>Regards,
>
>Gavin
>
>
>
>On 31 Mar 2014, at 17:03, Gavin Cornwell <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi Lukas,
>> 
>> I’m going to retract that statement, we have found some more
>>occurrences of the issue in CMISFolder and a couple in CMISSession.
>> 
>> Please continue to hold off the release until tomorrow.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Gavin
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 31 Mar 2014, at 16:40, Gavin Cornwell <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Lukas,
>>> 
>>> The issue with cancelling create operations is resolved and the fix
>>>committed.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Gavin
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 31 Mar 2014, at 15:48, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Gavin,
>>>> 
>>>> Sure - just drop me an email when you have fixed the issue :)
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Lukas
>>>> 
>>>> On 3/31/14 3:51 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Lukas,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I’ve found another bug (uploads do not cancel) that would be really
>>>>>good
>>>>> to be fixed before we do the 0.3 release.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I’m testing a solution right now, can you please hold off the release
>>>>> until I’ve committed the fix?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Gavin
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 28 Mar 2014, at 08:29, Gavin Cornwell
>>>>><gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sounds great, many thanks Lukas.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 28 Mar 2014, at 07:50, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com>
wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We have some minor fixes on our side that I'm going to commit
>>>>>>>today.
>>>>>>> I will take care of the 0.3 release next week.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 3/27/14 12:29 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I have run through all the tests on our side and found a
couple of
>>>>>>>> minor
>>>>>>>> issues that I addressed yesterday (project settings and a
progress
>>>>>>>> issue).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> There is still an Xcode warning/suggestion on the project
settings
>>>>>>>> (when
>>>>>>>> using Xcode 5.1) which caused a problem building with Xcode
5.0 so
>>>>>>>> I’ve
>>>>>>>> left them as they were for now. The 64 bit slice is being
>>>>>>>>included in
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> binary so I think this will be fine for this release.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Unless you have a different opinion on the project settings
I
>>>>>>>>think
>>>>>>>> we’re
>>>>>>>> ready for the 0.3 release.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 25 Mar 2014, at 15:24, Gavin Cornwell
>>>>>>>><gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> There’s one more thing to check on our side before
giving the
>>>>>>>>>green
>>>>>>>>> light for 0.3, I will work on that tomorrow and let you
know as
>>>>>>>>>soon
>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>> I can.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 25 Mar 2014, at 06:38, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com>
>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Alright then. Just give me you OK when everything
is ready for
>>>>>>>>>>0.3
>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>> your side. I will then do the release.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Whenever you are ready for the initial browser binding
checkin
>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>> me know so that we can have a look and discuss the
further
>>>>>>>>>>approach
>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/24/14 11:14 AM, "Gavin Cornwell"
>>>>>>>>>><gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good to me, I just need to check here
that there isn¹t
>>>>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>>>>> else required for 0.3, the guy I need to ask
is beck from
>>>>>>>>>>>holiday
>>>>>>>>>>> tomorrow so I¹ll send a response tomorrow if
that¹s OK?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> If you don¹t mind doing the release that is
absolutely fine
>>>>>>>>>>>with me
>>>>>>>>>>> ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding the browser binding, I created the
branch over the
>>>>>>>>>>> weekend
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> have merged the work I did previously into that
locally. There
>>>>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>> some work to do before I¹m happy doing an initial
commit, but I
>>>>>>>>>>> plan
>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> doing that in the evenings this week so I should
have
>>>>>>>>>>>something to
>>>>>>>>>>> contribute soon.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 Mar 2014, at 16:46, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent thats also our opinion. However
ACL write support is
>>>>>>>>>>>> not on
>>>>>>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>>>>>> list for the next weeks, so I would rather
do a release now
>>>>>>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>> concentrate on Browser Binding.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you want me to do the release? Please
let me know how you
>>>>>>>>>>>>want
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> proceed.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/14 12:29 PM, "Gavin Cornwell"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think yes, we should target the 0.3
release without the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>browser
>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will probably need a 0.3 release sooner
than 3-4 months
>>>>>>>>>>>>>(most
>>>>>>>>>>>>> likely
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the next month) and I will only be
able to work on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>browser
>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a background task in my spare time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My preference therefore would be to finish
your ACL write
>>>>>>>>>>>>> features
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release that as 0.3 and then have a 0.4
release for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>browser
>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>> support.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Mar 2014, at 13:01, Gross, Lukas
<lukas.gross@sap.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The main question is: Do we target
a 0.3 release without
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>browser
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or do we plan to get browser binding
done first. From our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>side
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> depends on the timeframe in which
we can get this done. If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this done within lets say the next
2 to 3 months I would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>prefer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bundle
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything together and release 0.3.
If you think we need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>longer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should consider moving browser binding
to 0.4. However we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strong
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demand for browser binding and therefore
plan to have at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>least
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working full-time on this topic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only other thing currently in
our pipeline is write
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ACLs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We recently committed the parser
for read support however
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>write
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing. We plan to do this also
during the next weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/14 10:27 AM, "Gavin Cornwell"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent, a 0.3 release would
also be really useful for us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would suggest doing a release
sooner rather than later,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation tasks are there
from your side that would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before 0.3?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gav
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Mar 2014, at 07:58, Gross,
Lukas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><lukas.gross@sap.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that it would be
more consistent to have only the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> object
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cancel a request. I will
change our code to use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> objects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancel method and then remove
the stop parameter from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> library.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had problems using Google
hangout in the past, however
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another try. Just let me
know when you have setup the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schedule a session.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should also discuss the
timeframe for the upcoming
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tasks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so that we can plan the Objective
CMIS 0.3 release. We
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release as early as possible
so that we can get an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>approval
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/14 10:21 PM, "Gavin
Cornwell"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do see your point about
the stop parameter being a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paradigm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iOS, however, personally
I would prefer that we remove
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>it,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> especially
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the request approach
works. We then have one consistent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>way
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations across the
whole library (the parameter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>approach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable to methods
with progress).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great to hear you're
also interested in the browser
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>binding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> initial work a while
ago so I need to sync it with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>recent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll commit it in a branch
as soon as I can.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I too think it would
be a great idea to resurrect the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>status
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meeting,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even if it's just once
a month. I will schedule something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committed something.
Can you remind me, are you guys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hangouts or would webex
be a better choice?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>

Mime
View raw message