Mailing-List: contact dev-help@chemistry.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@chemistry.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com
 designates 207.126.144.121 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
Subject: Re: Commits to ObjectiveCMIS
From: Gavin Cornwell <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF4CD3EA.4B6E%lukas.gross@sap.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 20:57:57 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <65421DE5-0270-424D-AF0A-3B32CCD2A0FD@alfresco.com>
References: <CF4CD3EA.4B6E%lukas.gross@sap.com>
To: dev@chemistry.apache.org

Hi,

I did have one question regarding the new *stop parameter, I=92m just =
curious why the stop parameter was required when we already have a =
mechanism (via the CMISRequest object) to cancel running operations?

Thanks very much for adding secondary type support too, we were planning =
on doing that as well some point soon. I presume this was to support the =
1.1 binding? Do you know what else we need to do in order to support a =
1.1 atom binding?

Finally, as I background project I have started looking at the browser =
binding, I have some *very* early support for the browser binding on my =
machine. I was thinking of creating a branch for this once the initial =
commit is ready as it is going to require some minor moving and renaming =
of files. Does any have any objection to the creation of a branch?

Regards,

Gavin


On 17 Mar 2014, at 15:36, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>=20
> I fixed the project file (missing files) and added some fixes so that =
all tests are green again.
> BTW: Please ignore my comment (below) about the incompatible changes =
(I've made them some time ago) we currently still support the old =
interfaces, however we can discuss if we want to get rid of them for 0.3 =
or if we want to keep them for simple use cases.
>=20
> Best Regards,
> Lukas
>=20
>=20
> From: <Gross>, Lukas Gross =
<lukas.gross@sap.com<mailto:lukas.gross@sap.com>>
> Date: Monday, March 17, 2014 3:02 PM
> To: "dev@chemistry.apache.org<mailto:dev@chemistry.apache.org>" =
<dev@chemistry.apache.org<mailto:dev@chemistry.apache.org>>
> Subject: Commits to ObjectiveCMIS
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> As announced earlier today we merged our changes (faster than I =
thought) and committed them.
> Please have a close look to the changes as they also include an =
incompatible API change: We added a *stop parameter to the progress =
block of all transmission methods, so that it is possible to abort the =
transmission. We decided against creating new interfaces with the *stop =
flag and just modified the exiting ones as creating additional =
interfaces would basically double all transmission interfaces.
> Please let us know if anyone has a different opinion on this topic.
>=20
> Best Regards,
> Lukas