chemistry-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gavin Cornwell <gavin.cornw...@alfresco.com>
Subject Re: Commits to ObjectiveCMIS
Date Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:40:08 GMT
Hi Lukas,

The issue with cancelling create operations is resolved and the fix committed.

Regards,

Gavin



On 31 Mar 2014, at 15:48, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com> wrote:

> Hi Gavin,
> 
> Sure - just drop me an email when you have fixed the issue :)
> 
> Cheers,
> Lukas
> 
> On 3/31/14 3:51 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Lukas,
>> 
>> I’ve found another bug (uploads do not cancel) that would be really good
>> to be fixed before we do the 0.3 release.
>> 
>> I’m testing a solution right now, can you please hold off the release
>> until I’ve committed the fix?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Gavin
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 28 Mar 2014, at 08:29, Gavin Cornwell <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Sounds great, many thanks Lukas.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Gavin
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 28 Mar 2014, at 07:50, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> We have some minor fixes on our side that I'm going to commit today.
>>>> I will take care of the 0.3 release next week.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Lukas
>>>> 
>>>> On 3/27/14 12:29 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have run through all the tests on our side and found a couple of
>>>>> minor
>>>>> issues that I addressed yesterday (project settings and a progress
>>>>> issue).
>>>>> 
>>>>> There is still an Xcode warning/suggestion on the project settings
>>>>> (when
>>>>> using Xcode 5.1) which caused a problem building with Xcode 5.0 so
>>>>> I’ve
>>>>> left them as they were for now. The 64 bit slice is being included in
>>>>> the
>>>>> binary so I think this will be fine for this release.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Unless you have a different opinion on the project settings I think
>>>>> we’re
>>>>> ready for the 0.3 release.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Gavin
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 25 Mar 2014, at 15:24, Gavin Cornwell <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There’s one more thing to check on our side before giving the green
>>>>>> light for 0.3, I will work on that tomorrow and let you know as soon
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> I can.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 25 Mar 2014, at 06:38, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com>
wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Alright then. Just give me you OK when everything is ready for
0.3
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> your side. I will then do the release.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Whenever you are ready for the initial browser binding checkin
>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>> me know so that we can have a look and discuss the further approach
>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 3/24/14 11:14 AM, "Gavin Cornwell" <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Sounds good to me, I just need to check here that there isn¹t
>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>> else required for 0.3, the guy I need to ask is beck from
holiday
>>>>>>>> tomorrow so I¹ll send a response tomorrow if that¹s OK?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If you don¹t mind doing the release that is absolutely fine
with me
>>>>>>>> ;-)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regarding the browser binding, I created the branch over
the
>>>>>>>> weekend
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> have merged the work I did previously into that locally.
There is
>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>> some work to do before I¹m happy doing an initial commit,
but I
>>>>>>>> plan
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> doing that in the evenings this week so I should have something
to
>>>>>>>> contribute soon.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 21 Mar 2014, at 16:46, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Excellent thats also our opinion. However ACL write support
is
>>>>>>>>> not on
>>>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>>> list for the next weeks, so I would rather do a release
now and
>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>> concentrate on Browser Binding.
>>>>>>>>> Do you want me to do the release? Please let me know
how you want
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> proceed.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/14 12:29 PM, "Gavin Cornwell"
>>>>>>>>> <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I think yes, we should target the 0.3 release without
the browser
>>>>>>>>>> binding.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> We will probably need a 0.3 release sooner than 3-4
months (most
>>>>>>>>>> likely
>>>>>>>>>> in the next month) and I will only be able to work
on the browser
>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>> as a background task in my spare time.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> My preference therefore would be to finish your ACL
write
>>>>>>>>>> features
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> release that as 0.3 and then have a 0.4 release for
the browser
>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>> support.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Mar 2014, at 13:01, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> The main question is: Do we target a 0.3 release
without browser
>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>> or do we plan to get browser binding done first.
From our side
>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>> depends on the timeframe in which we can get
this done. If we
>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>> this done within lets say the next 2 to 3 months
I would prefer
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> bundle
>>>>>>>>>>> everything together and release 0.3. If you think
we need longer
>>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>> should consider moving browser binding to 0.4.
However we have a
>>>>>>>>>>> strong
>>>>>>>>>>> demand for browser binding and therefore plan
to have at least
>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>> person
>>>>>>>>>>> working full-time on this topic.
>>>>>>>>>>> The only other thing currently in our pipeline
is write support
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> ACLs.
>>>>>>>>>>> We recently committed the parser for read support
however write
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>> missing. We plan to do this also during the next
weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/14 10:27 AM, "Gavin Cornwell"
>>>>>>>>>>> <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent, a 0.3 release would also be really
useful for us
>>>>>>>>>>>> too.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would suggest doing a release sooner rather
than later, what
>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation tasks are there from your
side that would need
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>>>>> before 0.3?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Gav
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Mar 2014, at 07:58, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that it would be more consistent
to have only the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>> object
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cancel a request. I will change our
code to use the request
>>>>>>>>>>>>> objects
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancel method and then remove the stop
parameter from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> library.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had problems using Google hangout
in the past, however we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> another try. Just let me know when you
have setup the branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> schedule a session.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should also discuss the timeframe
for the upcoming
>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tasks
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so that we can plan the Objective CMIS
0.3 release. We need
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release as early as possible so that
we can get an approval
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/14 10:21 PM, "Gavin Cornwell"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do see your point about the stop
parameter being a common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paradigm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iOS, however, personally I would
prefer that we remove it,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> especially
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the request approach works. We then
have one consistent way
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations across the whole library
(the parameter approach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable to methods with progress).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great to hear you're also interested
in the browser binding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> initial work a while ago so I need
to sync it with the recent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll commit it in a branch as soon
as I can.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I too think it would be a great idea
to resurrect the status
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meeting,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even if it's just once a month. I
will schedule something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committed something. Can you remind
me, are you guys able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hangouts or would webex be a better
choice?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 


Mime
View raw message