chemistry-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gavin Cornwell <gavin.cornw...@alfresco.com>
Subject Re: Commits to ObjectiveCMIS
Date Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:03:42 GMT
Hi Lukas,

I’m going to retract that statement, we have found some more occurrences of the issue in
CMISFolder and a couple in CMISSession.

Please continue to hold off the release until tomorrow.

Regards,

Gavin



On 31 Mar 2014, at 16:40, Gavin Cornwell <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com> wrote:

> Hi Lukas,
> 
> The issue with cancelling create operations is resolved and the fix committed.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Gavin
> 
> 
> 
> On 31 Mar 2014, at 15:48, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Gavin,
>> 
>> Sure - just drop me an email when you have fixed the issue :)
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Lukas
>> 
>> On 3/31/14 3:51 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Lukas,
>>> 
>>> I’ve found another bug (uploads do not cancel) that would be really good
>>> to be fixed before we do the 0.3 release.
>>> 
>>> I’m testing a solution right now, can you please hold off the release
>>> until I’ve committed the fix?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Gavin
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 28 Mar 2014, at 08:29, Gavin Cornwell <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Sounds great, many thanks Lukas.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Gavin
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 28 Mar 2014, at 07:50, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> We have some minor fixes on our side that I'm going to commit today.
>>>>> I will take care of the 0.3 release next week.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Lukas
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 3/27/14 12:29 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I have run through all the tests on our side and found a couple of
>>>>>> minor
>>>>>> issues that I addressed yesterday (project settings and a progress
>>>>>> issue).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There is still an Xcode warning/suggestion on the project settings
>>>>>> (when
>>>>>> using Xcode 5.1) which caused a problem building with Xcode 5.0 so
>>>>>> I’ve
>>>>>> left them as they were for now. The 64 bit slice is being included
in
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> binary so I think this will be fine for this release.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Unless you have a different opinion on the project settings I think
>>>>>> we’re
>>>>>> ready for the 0.3 release.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 25 Mar 2014, at 15:24, Gavin Cornwell <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> There’s one more thing to check on our side before giving the
green
>>>>>>> light for 0.3, I will work on that tomorrow and let you know
as soon
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> I can.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 25 Mar 2014, at 06:38, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Alright then. Just give me you OK when everything is ready
for 0.3
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> your side. I will then do the release.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Whenever you are ready for the initial browser binding checkin
>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>> me know so that we can have a look and discuss the further
approach
>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 3/24/14 11:14 AM, "Gavin Cornwell" <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Sounds good to me, I just need to check here that there
isn¹t
>>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>>> else required for 0.3, the guy I need to ask is beck
from holiday
>>>>>>>>> tomorrow so I¹ll send a response tomorrow if that¹s
OK?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> If you don¹t mind doing the release that is absolutely
fine with me
>>>>>>>>> ;-)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Regarding the browser binding, I created the branch over
the
>>>>>>>>> weekend
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> have merged the work I did previously into that locally.
There is
>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>> some work to do before I¹m happy doing an initial commit,
but I
>>>>>>>>> plan
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>> doing that in the evenings this week so I should have
something to
>>>>>>>>> contribute soon.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 21 Mar 2014, at 16:46, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Excellent thats also our opinion. However ACL write
support is
>>>>>>>>>> not on
>>>>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>>>> list for the next weeks, so I would rather do a release
now and
>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>> concentrate on Browser Binding.
>>>>>>>>>> Do you want me to do the release? Please let me know
how you want
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> proceed.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/14 12:29 PM, "Gavin Cornwell"
>>>>>>>>>> <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I think yes, we should target the 0.3 release
without the browser
>>>>>>>>>>> binding.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> We will probably need a 0.3 release sooner than
3-4 months (most
>>>>>>>>>>> likely
>>>>>>>>>>> in the next month) and I will only be able to
work on the browser
>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>> as a background task in my spare time.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> My preference therefore would be to finish your
ACL write
>>>>>>>>>>> features
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> release that as 0.3 and then have a 0.4 release
for the browser
>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>> support.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Mar 2014, at 13:01, Gross, Lukas <lukas.gross@sap.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The main question is: Do we target a 0.3
release without browser
>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>> or do we plan to get browser binding done
first. From our side
>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>> depends on the timeframe in which we can
get this done. If we
>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>> this done within lets say the next 2 to 3
months I would prefer
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> bundle
>>>>>>>>>>>> everything together and release 0.3. If you
think we need longer
>>>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>> should consider moving browser binding to
0.4. However we have a
>>>>>>>>>>>> strong
>>>>>>>>>>>> demand for browser binding and therefore
plan to have at least
>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>> person
>>>>>>>>>>>> working full-time on this topic.
>>>>>>>>>>>> The only other thing currently in our pipeline
is write support
>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> ACLs.
>>>>>>>>>>>> We recently committed the parser for read
support however write
>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>> missing. We plan to do this also during the
next weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/14 10:27 AM, "Gavin Cornwell"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent, a 0.3 release would also be
really useful for us
>>>>>>>>>>>>> too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would suggest doing a release sooner
rather than later, what
>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation tasks are there from your
side that would need
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>>>>>> before 0.3?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gav
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Mar 2014, at 07:58, Gross, Lukas
<lukas.gross@sap.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that it would be more consistent
to have only the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> object
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cancel a request. I will change
our code to use the request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> objects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancel method and then remove the
stop parameter from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> library.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had problems using Google hangout
in the past, however we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another try. Just let me know when
you have setup the branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schedule a session.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should also discuss the timeframe
for the upcoming
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tasks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so that we can plan the Objective
CMIS 0.3 release. We need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release as early as possible so that
we can get an approval
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/14 10:21 PM, "Gavin Cornwell"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <gavin.cornwell@alfresco.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do see your point about the
stop parameter being a common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paradigm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iOS, however, personally I would
prefer that we remove it,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> especially
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the request approach works. We
then have one consistent way
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations across the whole library
(the parameter approach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable to methods with progress).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great to hear you're also interested
in the browser binding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> initial work a while ago so I
need to sync it with the recent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll commit it in a branch as
soon as I can.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I too think it would be a great
idea to resurrect the status
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meeting,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even if it's just once a month.
I will schedule something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committed something. Can you
remind me, are you guys able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hangouts or would webex be a
better choice?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 


Mime
View raw message