Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-chemistry-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-chemistry-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 410FEE5FC for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:36:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3775 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2012 14:36:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-chemistry-dev-archive@chemistry.apache.org Received: (qmail 3579 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2012 14:36:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@chemistry.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@chemistry.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@chemistry.apache.org Received: (qmail 3523 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2012 14:36:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:36:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fguillaume@nuxeo.com designates 209.85.212.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.43] (HELO mail-vb0-f43.google.com) (209.85.212.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:36:16 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id fs19so3026672vbb.2 for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 06:35:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=t/khPb9uA2eG2oH02L9ZVCXJfd0h7eMf4BzpOot1L98=; b=G9i+Wp/hD9N3Tyxz2So8EhFiRcfZrFbj8ITO3TN5HgyYkj/p9kvTJcy08ZrRG+CQzU xuuzOuZR8eUEV+I0F+OMUFJO/Yo0rdMYVuA7krWko89eOThaVjLN6uiZJxMb/o6Wmshp JEBqvA2eg6tPYSIphiP57KbQEX9uw07nGvAddTiX/Ohm5wta0jCMAsS1AqfyxtvNb8m+ qLjhMPRvu+IZawrKEEBM+RkRPidioHMYwDbdS5D6lma0cFFy68pHKutGIC2JFX5fs4zt Hy7QXWr42evgBI2k7wDy6oe5dR5AotxLSLQ/o4PbzXLQ7y0aZvMCH8DebVuVqfmiikfn Cd/A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.98.98 with SMTP id eh2mr1541401vdb.64.1354631755658; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 06:35:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.240.40 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 06:35:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <267327a0fccbaa2cdaafbfcb983e8778-EhVcXl9JQQFXRwQFDQkEXR0wfgZLV15fQUBFBEFYXS9aBFgIVQkjAVVfDwkJFE8AXVpYSlJXWAgwXnUEVlxeW1hHQQ==-webmailer2@server01.webmailer.hosteurope.de> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 07:35:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Transient Object in OpenCMIS From: Florent Guillaume To: dev@chemistry.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f380a98f6dd04d007c82f X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlp6dsshHJ5kAckizusldxAICvBbrC7rKTn7pHBaqlQ9pNRqhzwJrCUgcAoJKEQ75HLlLzf X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307f380a98f6dd04d007c82f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Since Nuxeo in local session mode seemed to be the only use of transient objects I don't want to prevent a simplification of the OpenCMIS code. Go ahead with the deprecation. I'll add wrappers on the Nuxeo side if it's really needed for us (which I'm not sure about, I haven't had time to look at this in detail in light of our current code). Florent On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Florian M=C3=BCller wrote= : > Since nobody complained, I will deprecate transient objects. > > Florian > > > > Hi, >> >> Does anyone use the transient objects in OpenCMIS (TransientDocument, >> TransientFolder, TransientRelationship, TransientPolicy)? >> >> If not I would like to deprecate them and not implement a transient >> object for the new CMIS Item object. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Florian >> > > --=20 Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87 --20cf307f380a98f6dd04d007c82f--