Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-chemistry-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-chemistry-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE4869814 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70491 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2012 14:54:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-chemistry-dev-archive@chemistry.apache.org Received: (qmail 70293 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2012 14:54:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@chemistry.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@chemistry.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@chemistry.apache.org Received: (qmail 70279 invoked by uid 99); 26 Sep 2012 14:54:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:54:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [92.51.170.72] (HELO server01.mc0.hosteurope.de) (92.51.170.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:54:45 +0000 Received: from server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de ([10.9.0.181]); by mailout.hosteurope.de (server01.mc0.hosteurope.de) running EXperimental Internet Mailer with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1TGt0K-00047Y-Hb for dev@chemistry.apache.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:54:24 +0200 Received: from nobody by server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGt0K-0004qP-Fp for dev@chemistry.apache.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:54:24 +0200 To: Subject: Re: Next OpenCMIS Release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:54:24 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Florian_M=C3=BCller?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: X-Sender: fmui@apache.org User-Agent: Host Europe Webmailer/2.0 X-HE-Access: Yes X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;fmui@apache.org;1348671264;78e41055; A general question regarding the release: Do we need the tar.gz release packages? Wouldn't the zip packages be sufficient? What do you think? Cheers, Florian > I am happy to do the release. Will wait for JMP final touches and go. > > Couple of things to speed up the process and not incur in unexpected > issues: > > 1. Are there any changes required to the build / release process? > (AKA new > / changed packages) If so, can you open an issue and assign it to me > so I > can take care of it? > > 2. If you have worked on some module since last release, can you > please run > a 'mvn clean install -Papache-release' on that module to ensure it > still > builds fine in the release profile? > > Thanks in advance, > > Gab > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:57 PM, JMP > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Just need to review and find the last difference between core and >> android >> version. >> Work in progress... I'm going to check everything tonight. >> >> +1 otherwise >> >> Jean Marie PASCAL >> Blog : www.opensourceecm.fr // www.open-source-ecm.com >> E-Mail : jeanmarie.pascal@gmail.com >> Skype : jeanmarie.pascal >> Twitter : jeanmariepascal >> >> >> 2012/9/24 Florian Müller >> >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > What are your thoughts about a new OpenCMIS release? >> > We have several unreleased features in SVN like Android support >> and the >> > OpenCMIS Bridge. The Browser Binding implementation has been >> improved and >> > is now completely following the CMIS 1.1 draft, which is now in >> public >> > review. And there have been several smaller fixes and >> interoperability >> > improvements. >> > >> > I think it is time to release OpenCMIS 0.8.0. >> > >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Florian >> > >> > >>