Mailing-List: contact dev-help@chemistry.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@chemistry.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jhuebel@opentext.com designates
 149.235.128.48 as permitted sender)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC2736.E4B67EE6"
Subject: What's the status with the 0.4 release?
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:24:01 +0200
Message-ID: <11E8705F4573E64FB42C724ADC742F6F03BD1FE1@MUCXGC2.opentext.net>
Thread-Topic: What's the status with the 0.4 release?
Thread-Index: AcwnNv1dkxS4eT/8QF267kA0Bfum3g==
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jens_H=FCbel?= <jhuebel@opentext.com>
To: <dev@chemistry.apache.org>

------_=_NextPart_001_01CC2736.E4B67EE6
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi folks,

=20

what are the current plans to go forward with our next release?

=20

The main reason I ask is that I have implemented the full-text-search in =
the parser. As these are several hundred lines of new/changed code there =
is of course some risk to break things. Therefore I would prefer to =
commit this after the release but on the other side I would like to keep =
the time having uncommitted changes to SVN as short as possible.

=20

Jens

=20


------_=_NextPart_001_01CC2736.E4B67EE6--