Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-chemistry-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45395 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 21:46:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 21:46:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 63669 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 21:46:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-chemistry-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63554 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 21:46:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact chemistry-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63546 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 21:46:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:46:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nick.burch@alfresco.com designates 207.126.144.133 as permitted sender) Received: from [207.126.144.133] (HELO eu1sys200aog112.obsmtp.com) (207.126.144.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:46:47 +0000 Received: from source ([88.151.129.3]) by eu1sys200aob112.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKTUh/Mo/772LvZfixkkc+aK7GJxgVsCMk@postini.com; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:46:26 UTC Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.alfresco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F15C0C0D3 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:46:26 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unx-d-manc4.tc.ifeltd.com Received: from zimbra.alfresco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.alfresco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MuhDzLVaNB-U for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:46:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from urchin.earth.li (urchin.earth.li [212.13.204.73]) (Authenticated sender: nick.burch@alfresco.com) by zimbra.alfresco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0004CC0C0D1 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:46:25 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:46:25 +0000 (GMT) From: Nick Burch X-X-Sender: nick@urchin.earth.li To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: cmislib 0.4 still waiting on two IPMC votes In-Reply-To: <781FA84E-0CA3-441E-9CBC-93AB155B39BF@nuxeo.com> Message-ID: References: <6114191.485221296595062009.JavaMail.root@zimbra.alfresco.com> <5E198D7D-5D4D-4AFA-83F3-A3B5CAF2D0DD@nuxeo.com> <8F03D8B4-5CCF-4DC4-973D-826ADA70E9FB@gmail.com> <781FA84E-0CA3-441E-9CBC-93AB155B39BF@nuxeo.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Stefane Fermigier wrote: > On Feb 1, 2011, at 10:39 PM, Nick Burch wrote: >> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Jeff Potts wrote: >>> Sorry, Stefane, you are correct, I should have counted your vote. I >>> guess with the -1 from Stefan Seelmann it is moot. I also agree with >>> you that looking through the archives is not a great way to count >>> votes. >> >> If you were subscribed to general@incubator then you'd see them come >> in. It might be worth you joining the list while the vote's ongoing > > I have no interest in joining yet another mailing list. Probably only Jeff needs to, as the person calling the vote > I think these votes should be done using a web app, so that each person > should be able to see at any time where we stand in terms of +1's, -1's, > who has voted, etc. I think we've tended to stick with mailing lists, so that votes can come with comments and trigger discussions. Normally votes only take place on the one list, and everyone voting is on that list, so it's not a big hardship + everyone can see and discuss. Incubator voting where you don't have enough IPMC members on your dev list are the special case... Nick