Mailing-List: contact chemistry-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 88.151.129.23 is neither permitted nor
 denied by domain of columbro@gmail.com)
Message-Id: <26F83F03-A097-4A40-8ED6-C3FB68F0F4CC@gmail.com>
From: Gabriele Columbro <columbro@gmail.com>
To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
In-Reply-To: 
 <2CDD44F49E3D47459EB0282354AE42AE23413268BB@DEWDFECCR05.wdf.sap.corp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Subject: Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:59:43 +0200
References: <56C255F88C54014E92512ED3E7848F9404C6ECD1@MUCXGC1.opentext.net>
 <267F7EC9C11CCB4C806D30029DA6776301434570@MUCXGC2.opentext.net>
 <AANLkTinF8XkIAkDrh_ScA5cojfXV1CHITiLZDmRX4EkE@mail.gmail.com>
 <2CDD44F49E3D47459EB0282354AE42AE23413268BB@DEWDFECCR05.wdf.sap.corp>

Ok guys,

 =46rom the feedback received the release version we're targeting is:

0.1.0

I agree we keep the x.y.z versioning scheme standard for all releases =20=

(will create a wiki to document that).

I'll proceed with the release preparation steps (@Florian: will ping =20
you for any help) and send a email to this list (and later to the =20
Incubator PMC [1] ) with the call for official vote.


HTH,
Gab


[1] =
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-in=
cubator-release-vote


On Jun 8, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Goetz, Paul wrote:

> +1
>
> I agree to omit "alpha" or "beta" like labels. In worst case we =20
> could go down to 0.0.1 ;o)
> But I would prefer 0.1.0 as proposed by Florian.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florent Guillaume [mailto:fg@nuxeo.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 8. Juni 2010 11:31
> To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
>
> Agreed too.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Jens H=FCbel <jhuebel@opentext.com> =20=

> wrote:
>> I agree to Florian and the 0.1 version.
>>
>> Jens
>>
>> -------------
>> This message is sent from Blackberry.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Florian M=FCller <fmueller@opentext.com>
>> To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org =
<chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org=20
>> >
>> Sent: Tue Jun 08 09:42:21 2010
>> Subject: RE: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think the code is stable enough that we don't need an "alpha" or =20=

>> "beta" label. On the other hand, we know that there will be API =20
>> changes in the (near?) future. So I suggest we start with the =20
>> version number 0.1.0.
>>
>> @Gabriele: Let me know if I can support you with the release =20
>> preparation.
>>
>>
>> - Florian
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gabriele Columbro [mailto:columbro@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Montag, 7. Juni 2010 22:37
>> To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: confluence-cmis@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
>>
>> Hey guys,
>> for now I redeployed the latest OpenCMIS SNAPSHOT, will look tomorrow
>> into how we can practically (with the current Ant release process) =20=

>> get
>> a release out there (also on the Apache Maven repo).
>> In such a case, what would be the version we would like to give to
>> this release?
>>
>> E.g. which one of the following does better reflect the readiness of
>> our implementation:
>>
>> - 1.0.0-alpha-1
>> - 1.0.0-beta-1
>>
>> or do you have any other ideas in mind?
>>
>> HTH,
>> Gab
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 7, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Florian M=FCller
>>> <fmueller@opentext.com> wrote:
>>>> I think we should do some sort of release soon for the reasons you
>>>> have mentioned.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>> What are the Apache rules for alpha and beta releases? I haven't
>>>> found much about
>>>> those types of releases on the Apache website.
>>>
>>> =46rom the ASF perspective anything that a project publishes beyond =20=

>>> the
>>> development community is a release and should be done following the
>>> relevant Apache policies. It's up to each community to decide what =20=

>>> to
>>> put into a release and how to label it.
>>>
>>> See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html for =20=

>>> more
>>> details about making releases at Apache.
>>>
>>> BR,
>>>
>>> Jukka Zitting
>>
>> --
>>
>> Eng. Gabriele Columbro
>> Alfresco Software, Ltd.
>>
>> M: +31 (0)627 565 103
>> P: +39 320 161 28 46
>> D: +44 (0)1628 876 654
>>
>> Skype: gabrielecolumbro
>> Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --=20
> Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
> Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
> http://www.nuxeo.com   http://www.nuxeo.org   +33 1 40 33 79 87

--=20

Eng. Gabriele Columbro
Alfresco Software, Ltd.

M: +31 (0)627 565 103
P: +39 320 161 28 46
D: +44 (0)1628 876 654

Skype: gabrielecolumbro
Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz