Mailing-List: contact celix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of a.broekhuis@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.174 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <520952D9.1080809@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
References: <5208A6D9.9090605@jansman.eu>
	<CA+T-u8cbyuj1Km1EiUhFQT-9kfg7z5F=8tXGSn=1erb+_MHHtA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5208D5D4.8010302@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
	<CAPhv5g-2D66Xugt8Z9f89eZnQKEsHfp9r9kr6sG1H2aXA3MBAw@mail.gmail.com>
	<520944B9.60800@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
	<520952D9.1080809@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:44:47 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CA+T-u8e-U=F+Psy=CY8wYKm_e=4grfTkJ3d1DPOQBQ8JVgH+Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: event admin headers
From: Alexander Broekhuis <a.broekhuis@gmail.com>
To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c36da2b147ac04e3ce9356

--001a11c36da2b147ac04e3ce9356
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi all,

Interesting results, but before rushing to details regarding this
research.. Wouldn't it be a good idea to take a look at the performance of
the latest release?

Especially since the Felix framework itself is now on 4.2, and not 4.0. The
event admin doesn't seem to be updated, but if there was a big difference
between running the Felix Event Admin on Felix or Knopflerfish, it might be
interesting to see what is does now.

Also, did you ask on the Felix mailing list? Just curious if anyone over
there is familiar with your research, and maybe working on improving the
Event Admin.

Regarding the test bundle, would it a good idea if we port it to Celix as
well? Perhaps Erik can use it to test his implementation :).


-- 
Met vriendelijke groet,

Alexander Broekhuis

--001a11c36da2b147ac04e3ce9356--