Mailing-List: contact celix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pepijnnoltes@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+T-u8e2Us7AXCVat1gZR4hKVLngND2aS8vuFtyn5kqSkKWw-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAPhv5g-jX1ar0NB-fi-XP5FWJfq=-X0tKOW71vh0+pNJe0kr5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+T-u8d_m+nFgVKK06CUPbLXULiRXBzns1hj63=rg+GmNJKgqA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPhv5g_qrZdLSWXPwAQYvcwenvup6OSy06aR2XHW7tVY=XHgyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+T-u8e2Us7AXCVat1gZR4hKVLngND2aS8vuFtyn5kqSkKWw-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:51:44 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAPhv5g_jkh+T=HTUXL_mtD3gckLoboim6tnURXUj0Zc2ObxZQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Google summer of code
From: Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnoltes@gmail.com>
To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b3970d3b6ecd83704d8e5d2f3

--485b3970d3b6ecd83704d8e5d2f3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Alexander Broekhuis <a.broekhuis@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > I am not so sure on this one. Is there any specific reason and/or need
> for
> > > this support? I don't have a feeling this is used a lot in the OSGi
> > world.
> > > But I might be mistaken...
> > >
> >
> > Well I know we (Thales) will eventually need this for security reasons
> and
> > I was thinking that this is small enough to be realistic to realize in
> the
> > time frame (mid June till mid/end September), maybe even too small ?
> >
>
> I don't know how large it is. While I understand the Thales point of view,
> we also should try to keep in touch with the Celix community... So I am not
> sure what to do ;).
>
> I am inclined to say that this is fine if no one else objects...
>

Well signed jars is part of the OSGi spec, so that would IMO qualify it for
a "nice to have".


>
> >
> >
>
> > >
> > > I personally see much more need for a EventAdmin and ConfigurationAdmin
> > > implementation. Another interesting part might be Remote Services, and
> > then
> > > in combination with Java OSGi Remote Services. Ie, protocol
> > implementation
> > > and discovery.
> > >
> >
> > Well, the EventAdmin would be very welcome, so I agree on that one.
> >
>
> Seeing the time, perhaps an idea to do 2 things?
>


Yes, I agree.


>
>
> >
> > At the moment I am supervising two students, one is working on remote
> > services and the other one on the ConfigurationAdmin. So I don't think we
> > need a gsoc project for those subjects.
> >
> > I am now realizing that it a good idea to keep this mailing list up to
> date
> > with the development the students work.  I will ask the students to
> > introduce them self to this mailing list and once in a while post an
> update
> > of their progress.
> >
>
> Would be great to hear what they are doing! At this moment the Celix list
> and work is really quiet... If you need some sort of review on their work,
> feel free to contact me off-list.
>
>
> --
> Met vriendelijke groet,
>
> Alexander Broekhuis
>

--485b3970d3b6ecd83704d8e5d2f3--