Mailing-List: contact celix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of a.broekhuis@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.49 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e6a94f99-b4ec-4db1-b605-9740739e9cac@email.android.com>
References: <510b829a.05e6440a.26f4.ffffa620SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
	<CA+T-u8cvw40XTRCxxeWWC9p3UdSR-nWqJB3YGAq0Y-cphzL+1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<510b9b69.294e420a.783d.6400SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
	<CA+T-u8d=YUSwykNheVQZbWH6ZWpXjOv3mV3dPLPW6FwGCzGLNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<e6a94f99-b4ec-4db1-b605-9740739e9cac@email.android.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:25:14 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CA+T-u8evWLpR4z4gdsvUxOC+2UhS8zxJ4m8h4tdM4FbgD+Bzsg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: celix example under windows
From: Alexander Broekhuis <a.broekhuis@gmail.com>
To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175d67981ad50504d4e1d554

--0015175d67981ad50504d4e1d554
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

2013/2/1 Marcel Offermans <marcel.offermans@luminis.nl>

> Would it make sense to do a new release?
>

I would like to say yes, but there are still some problems running on
windows. I would like to do some more testing etc. Having a release
specifically for windows which doesn't work isn't a good idea imho.

I find it quite tricky, and am not sure what is the best way to go.. Not
having a release which supports windows might scare off users, but having a
release which compiles, but doesn't run could as well scare new users off.

I do hope Lionel gets it working, and we can fix the problems he finds. If
all seems to be pretty good, I am in favor of a new release.

On a side note, there aren't many tests in Celix. This makes it difficult
to check if all works on Windows. I am working on unit tests for the
framework, but having integration tests might be even more important.


-- 
Met vriendelijke groet,

Alexander Broekhuis

--0015175d67981ad50504d4e1d554--