Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A16CED82D for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 07:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87678 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2012 07:24:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 87637 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2012 07:24:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact celix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 87616 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2012 07:24:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 07:24:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pepijnnoltes@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-wg0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 07:24:19 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id dq11so1639834wgb.0 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:23:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=dZr2iCUmNae/CXXc8EIICg7LuRhXBApbHXypqNzXD6I=; b=aOIu3PR/sHrtvcK3xYN256U16ayveK5qYC/4YzdhWPAAjW01YXCJQYRefEhHTxegp/ aZwXRaWwJ3/XwHjwU/SFVd07jtDWsYPsULkwWAy03Die0TrihFuSIs8J3jG2VtQAYsVu CoMO0WKP+E3lSwvxQ7c81jFNbhYUXjLLN/NVWRBxwjO5OFlYZl0ZaIgQEzk26+o6Jvbg Sz25aHJOMNdNUHQl00efSZwIw2iTM6HPmRmjwKraNmo7Swr47OsNbJeVvJK+dW0gRPmV K8EIyO4XMrrHaWE7cjPaQGUibai4GNIGZ3uTJ/1H4q4TVt9Y287+a9hfvSukn/W7nqoZ DuGg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.197.166 with SMTP id t38mr4763390wen.109.1350890638548; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:23:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.48.202 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:23:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:23:58 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release celix-0.0.1-incubating From: Pepijn Noltes To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d64c58a41f2a04cca0bcc8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d64c58a41f2a04cca0bcc8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 (non-binding) Checked the signatures, build everything and ran the deployed bundles in the build dir. I also did notice that the tarball downloaded from wget match the signatures, but the tarballs downloaded with Firefox and Chrome don't match. If you gunzip the tarrballs from Firefox and Chrome they do match. So downloading from a browser gets a gzip version of the tarball ?? IMO the released tarball is correct, but I am curious what is going on. Greetings, Pepijn On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Karl Pauls wrote: > +1 > > I verified the sigs, looked at the LICENSE and headers, etc. and > managed to build and run the release minus the examples. > > The build didn't work like it is described in the BUILDING: > > 1. I had to create the celix-build dir alongside the > celix-0.0.1-incubating dir to make it work. > 2. There where missing dependencies which where only mentioned in the > http://incubator.apache.org/celix/documentation/buildingandrunning.html > but not in the BUILDING > 3. I needed Openslp to get it to build which isn't mentioned in the > BUILDING nor in > http://incubator.apache.org/celix/documentation/buildingandrunning.html. > > I couldn't build the examples as i don't have gnome. Otherwise, looks > good to me. > > Good Job! > > regards, > > Karl > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: > > I started looking into the release. Looks good as of now - nice job. > > However, I'm having a very busy week and I'm not done yet. I'll get > > back to building the release on sunday and try to vote by then. > > > > regards, > > > > Karl > > > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Alexander Broekhuis > > wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix! > >> The last few months we have been working on this release. > >> Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the required > >> files into the correct place etc. > >> > >> The source release file and signatures can be found on: > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celix/celix-0.0.1-incubating/ > >> > >> Before voting please review the section, > >> "What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?", at > >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > >> > >> Since this is the first release made by Celix, please do an extensive > check, > >> to verify all is correct. If all checks out and looks good, I will call > the > >> vote on > >> the general list. > >> > >> Please vote to approve this release: > >> > >> [ ] +1 Approve the release > >> [ ] -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments) > >> > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >> > >> -- > >> With kind regards, > >> > >> Alexander Broekhuis > > > > > > > > -- > > Karl Pauls > > karlpauls@gmail.com > > http://twitter.com/karlpauls > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls > > https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls > > > > -- > Karl Pauls > karlpauls@gmail.com > http://twitter.com/karlpauls > http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls > https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls > --0016e6d64c58a41f2a04cca0bcc8--