Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65819 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 13:28:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 13:28:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 86505 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 13:28:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86481 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 13:28:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact celix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86469 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 13:28:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:28:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of a.broekhuis@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-wy0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:28:12 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so2390232wyb.6 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:27:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=yNkytWvfL+wLaJIb132FjpAAYCYUUMDSkMaeEeLpZTk=; b=QQPTT+ySWm/64S2Bx5OQmOlmYBo1FQY9osL0WX+4hgUTAz36K2krZpcYpDVgRN71rW oTWeFL0g1/qtSvjw0a4DCI9c8t6kXwhlW7eLUOPUoiuLoDGKp4ZxOlxoQVDTRR4aae2q RPTI0CAoxYPkLupHG8eSzorDuxXPLmo+F4Hd0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=B6JjrgAKo4s0wOCJLdzbw3J5S36SYeHwrceuGseSfXsaL0RM/NlvW40vwn84eOgkK6 ccdiZ5Ehn4kUBB/hOh/jFtaH9IL8fzXjMs/CdGuFEzuUGfiR9w2vVA4UH93Fs9pWErww t23Nk2mB8y/8zCYmLZypa5hQd0ngQ5R5/DkZA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.171.76 with SMTP id q54mr1495906wel.93.1297949270987; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:27:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.48.145 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:27:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <79A5AD88-78AB-499B-968F-3C2BDD55B0CE@free.fr> References: <79A5AD88-78AB-499B-968F-3C2BDD55B0CE@free.fr> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:27:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Unloading or lack thereof, aka dlclose From: Alexander Broekhuis To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Francois, > Hello list, > I'm interested in SOA frameworks for embedded devices, and WSN development. Thanks for your interest, I hope Celix can offer something useful for you > > I've been reading through the source code and noticed nothing was ever unloaded. > I was wondering if this was either intentional (and what's the rationale behind this), or either just not-done-yet-but-on-the-TODO-list ? This is definitely something that is on the todo list. Following the OSGi spec, during a bundle uninstall, everything from that bundle should be closed and unloaded. At the moment there is no TODO list somewhere, might be a good thing to at to the website. -- Kind regards, Alexander Broekhuis