cayenne-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>
Subject Re: EJBQL vs JPAQL
Date Thu, 16 Aug 2018 08:07:06 GMT
We need to decide. "select" is first on the list. Update and delete will require separate query
objects.

Andrus

> On Aug 15, 2018, at 9:21 PM, Bob Schellink <sabob1@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Interesting. Would that still support update/delete? Or selects only?
> 
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 7:23 PM Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> You are totally right. EJBQL name is obsolete and was borrowed at one time
>> from the JPA spec before it got renamed there.
>> 
>> There is a more ambitious plan for it though - simply make it a parseable
>> String representation of ObjectSelect query. It requires ObjectSelect to
>> catch up on some of the functionality only available in EJBQLQuery now, but
>> it is getting pretty close.
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>> 
>>> On Aug 15, 2018, at 8:07 PM, Bob Schellink <sabob1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Would it make sense to rename EJBQLQuery to JPAQLQuery? Not sure is there
>>> is a difference between the two languages, but the name JPAQL is more
>>> commonly used.
>>> 
>>> Kind regards
>>> 
>>> Bob
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message