Mailing-List: contact user-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@cayenne.apache.org
From: Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Subject: Re: Schema generation fails in HSQLDB when generating foreign key
 constraints targeting tables with more than one join
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 08:46:15 +0530
References: <072201FC-7CDF-4DBF-9337-8DE5BC8C389F@karlmenn.is>
 <9276162E-8F58-4DAE-9C12-27496F933D6D@karlmenn.is>
 <1da620cd-12cd-47a8-7bd4-a5154584a774@maniatis.org>
To: user@cayenne.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <1da620cd-12cd-47a8-7bd4-a5154584a774@maniatis.org>
Message-Id: <F515F7D2-A633-4682-98D2-A53C70CAAFF9@objectstyle.org>
archived-at: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 03:16:29 -0000

+1 to upgrade. (as long as we figure out how to fix the failing SQL =
scripts)

> On Nov 11, 2016, at 4:02 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ari@maniatis.org> =
wrote:
>=20
> On 11/11/16 9:07am, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
>> Do you think it=E2=80=99s okay for us to upgrade? Any HSQLDB expert =
care to comment?
>=20
> Not an expert in HSQLDB (I tend to use Derby as my lightweight =
embedded db of choice). But I reckon few people are using HSQLDB for any =
production purposes, so it is really just a simple test environment and =
you should upgrade it without problem. At any rate, we may as well be =
testing against the latest version that has been out for many years.
>=20
>=20
> Ari
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> -------------------------->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A