cayenne-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Harunobu Oyama ...@telensa.com>
Subject Re: table/field names with more than one words
Date Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:11:53 GMT
Ari,

Thank you for your advice. I will suggest separating words with under bar
to the team.

nobu


On 11 July 2016 at 15:08, Aristedes Maniatis <ari@maniatis.org> wrote:

> On 11/07/2016 11:38pm, Harunobu Oyama wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > This is my firs post to this ML.
> >
> > I am using Cayenne 3.1.1 with PostreSQL 9.x.
> > We build our data model on a DB modeling tool, export DDL and execute it
> on
> > PostgreSQL, and then import the schema to Cayenne using
> SmartNamingStrategy.
> > In our naming convention, all names in DB are all UPPERCASELIKETHIS.
> >
> > It gives good looking names as long as the table/filed names are just one
> > word.
> >
> > What is the recommended way or good practice when the table names / field
> > names
> > consist of more than one word? The possible options I can think of are:
> >
> > Option-1: amend the object/attribute names one by one on CayenneModeler
> > Option-2: give physical names on DB schema in CamelNotation.
> >
> > As I am against editing names one by one manually, I was thinking to use
> > Option-2,
> > however, it is against our naming convention. We will change our
> convention
> > if it is
> > necessary, but I was wondering how other people are handling this.
>
>
> Its been a while since I used this feature, but I believe that a database
> table called "ARTIST_PAINTING" will be converted to an Object Entity name
> of ArtistPainting. Have you tested that?
>
> Ari
>
>
>
> --
> -------------------------->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message