Mailing-List: contact user-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@cayenne.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
Subject: Re: V3.0.2 org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain, line 258
From: Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>
In-Reply-To: <0351F2E1-81A7-4D8E-9513-0014B00AA01C@polyprotec.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:05:08 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <710AD940-34E8-4D7C-9747-6400C6E24A5E@objectstyle.org>
References: <44E986DC-C2DA-4B04-866E-AF2240E51D99@polyprotec.com>
 <0351F2E1-81A7-4D8E-9513-0014B00AA01C@polyprotec.com>
To: user@cayenne.apache.org

Hi =C9mile,

Welcome to the community!

Looks suspect to me too :) The good news is that 3.0 is ancient news and =
these days stack initialization is handled via dependency injection and =
more or less completely outside of the stack objects themselves.

Not sure if that code is causing you any trouble (if so, let=92s =
discuss), but in general I would recommend switching to 3.1 beta for =
your work.

Andrus


On Jan 15, 2014, at 8:05 PM, Emile Salem <esalem@polyprotec.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>=20
> as a first post to this list, I=92d like to ask the following:
> why does the DataDomain need to have a dataContextFactory declared in=20=

> its properties for the assignment of its queryCacheFactory to take =
place, as read on line 258 of org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain =
(3.0.2):
>=20
> if ((queryCacheFactoryName !=3D null) && (dataContextFactory !=3D =
null) && (!Util.isEmptyString(dataContextFactory))){
>    this.queryCacheFactory =3D =
((QueryCacheFactory)createInstance(queryCacheFactoryName, =
QueryCacheFactory.class));
> }
> else{
>    this.queryCacheFactory =3D null;
> }
> Thanks for your time
>=20
> =C9MILE SALEM
> Software Developer
> esalem@polyprotec.com