cayenne-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Scheibe <>
Subject Re: Cayenne and transactions
Date Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:26:41 GMT
Thanks Ari,

i'm trying to store information about the content of archives (ZIP and 
RAR) inside a database table. They usually consist of a few hundred up 
to 20-30k thousand entries and i would like to keep this inside a 
transaction either suceeding or failing in a whole for a single archive. 
Of course i could issue commits in between and process them in chunks 
but its more work and harder to maintain the rollback of the process if 
something goes wrong or fails during the import phase. As previously 
mentioned i have it working with plain SQL statements but would love to 
integrate Cayenne in between to get the full advantage and convenience 
of an O/R mapper. Furthermore i'm using XADisk's support for 
transactions on the filesystem level to keep it synchronized with the 
database (also works out great with larger transactions).

Appreciating your help! I will search the list again, maybe i've missed 
some stuff that has been discussed already.


Am 05.02.2012 13:28, schrieb Aristedes Maniatis:
> On 5/02/12 10:11 PM, Daniel Scheibe wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> i'm trying to figure out how Cayenne is handling transactions in
>> regards of when data is transferred to the database. I am trying to
>> get some large transactions (many small records or a few very large
>> records) working and so far haven't had luck. If i understand
>> correcly, Cayenne is holding my records in a cache and when i execute
>> the commitChanges() on the ObjectContext it starts to transfer all of
>> the data to the database (isolated in a real database transaction). So
>> my question is (and please correct me if my previuos assumption is
>> wrong) how can I influence on this behaviour since i pretty much need
>> Cayenne to use the database transaction more directly. When i skip
>> Cayenne and issue SQL statements right through the JDBC connection
>> TRANSACTION) it works fine as with MySQL i'm only restricted to the
>> maximum allowed size of the InnoDB transaction logfile which is quite
>> sufficient for my purposes. On the other hand
> i
>> completely understand that Cayenne would not know when i've finished
>> working with an Entity as there is no kind of "save" command on the
>> Entity itself.
>> Oh, this of course only goes for storing data inside the database, not
>> for reading.
>> Maybe some of you guys with a bit more insight into the Cayenne
>> internals can help me out on this or point me to the right direction.
>> Thanks in advance and a refreshing weekend!
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
> Can you explain a little more what you are trying to do and what problem
> you are trying to avoid. Yes, there are ways to control the transactions
> through Cayenne (search this list for many previous thread discussing
> this), but it sounds like you just need to commit your context at the
> appropriate places in your code.
> Ari

View raw message