Mailing-List: contact user-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@cayenne.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4ACA2C20.1030209@mengozzi.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:25:52 +0200
From: Emanuele Maiarelli <emanuele@mengozzi.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: user@cayenne.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about 3.0
References: <4ACA21D2.4060602@mengozzi.com>
 <BF59D1FA-AD60-4FCA-9176-E6E5955A13A6@roxanemy.com>
 <4ACA29D0.3090205@mengozzi.com>
 <9C9D1464-837E-41D8-92D5-AA748698DC94@roxanemy.com>
In-Reply-To: <9C9D1464-837E-41D8-92D5-AA748698DC94@roxanemy.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thank you, i'll give a try

Robert Zeigler ha scritto:
> Shouldn't be any missing methods.  There are a few deprecated methods, 
> mostly centering around generifying from DataContext, the class, to 
> ObjectContext, the interface.
>
> I upgraded a medium-sized project from 2.0.4 to 3.0 in about 30 minutes.
>
> Robert
>
> On Oct 5, 2009, at 10/512:16 PM , Emanuele Maiarelli wrote:
>
>> Robert Zeigler ha scritto:
>> it will give to code a bad impact, i mean a application written with 
>> 2.0.4 will have to face many methods deprecation or missing?
>>> I would give 3.0 a try.
>>> I'm using it in several production systems with no issues.
>>>
>>> Robert
>>>
>>> On Oct 5, 2009, at 10/511:41 AM , Emanuele Maiarelli wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm using cayenne 2.0.4 with ROP and a swing application, and 
>>>> everything working fine.
>>>>
>>>> I built a framework ontop of cayenne libs for managing prefetching 
>>>> and concurrent updates.
>>>>
>>>> I read that incoming cayene 3.0 will enanche ROP performances.
>>>>
>>>> Do you think i can try cayenne 3.0 or should be better stay with 
>>>> 2.0 until 3.0 goes in prodcution?
>>>>
>>>> Emanuele
>>>
>>
>