cayenne-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emanuele Maiarelli <emanu...@mengozzi.com>
Subject Re: question about 3.0
Date Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:25:52 GMT
Thank you, i'll give a try

Robert Zeigler ha scritto:
> Shouldn't be any missing methods.  There are a few deprecated methods, 
> mostly centering around generifying from DataContext, the class, to 
> ObjectContext, the interface.
>
> I upgraded a medium-sized project from 2.0.4 to 3.0 in about 30 minutes.
>
> Robert
>
> On Oct 5, 2009, at 10/512:16 PM , Emanuele Maiarelli wrote:
>
>> Robert Zeigler ha scritto:
>> it will give to code a bad impact, i mean a application written with 
>> 2.0.4 will have to face many methods deprecation or missing?
>>> I would give 3.0 a try.
>>> I'm using it in several production systems with no issues.
>>>
>>> Robert
>>>
>>> On Oct 5, 2009, at 10/511:41 AM , Emanuele Maiarelli wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm using cayenne 2.0.4 with ROP and a swing application, and 
>>>> everything working fine.
>>>>
>>>> I built a framework ontop of cayenne libs for managing prefetching 
>>>> and concurrent updates.
>>>>
>>>> I read that incoming cayene 3.0 will enanche ROP performances.
>>>>
>>>> Do you think i can try cayenne 3.0 or should be better stay with 
>>>> 2.0 until 3.0 goes in prodcution?
>>>>
>>>> Emanuele
>>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message