Mailing-List: contact user-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@cayenne.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.it;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=Jn3B+cQOeimiMSqSi51h7mGHtdVXWyCO2WKZECK+bk8eWO1d22+PQp6Tk0YDpefXki0MBRMD+tLTq3vT7JEt+p0dnktC6FsTPxGINjWTaz3PM7S00JYg+OECt08ojDrwZhtUHDxB7GJjkn0GsLy+vnwm0QuE8AXUp5bP+ovsJ+I=;
Message-ID: <32192.69697.qm@web24714.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
References: <f254b0270907220334x41b31d9fx52607a8ae1638f1c@mail.gmail.com>
  <882332.93932.qm@web24707.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
  <f254b0270907220432g47e62995m9b210c806317f091@mail.gmail.com>
  <7163.22578.qm@web24707.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
  <8f985b960907220539k4945f2dfoef094d9483335074@mail.gmail.com>
 <f254b0270907220647p23077381rb31a2fbf35cb76e6@mail.gmail.com>
 <652593.32410.qm@web24706.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:13:35 +0000 (GMT)
From: Emanuele Maiarelli <evvdrak@yahoo.it>
Subject: Re: Different DataContext
To: user@cayenne.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <652593.32410.qm@web24706.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1051189566-1248272015=:69697"

--0-1051189566-1248272015=:69697
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

and i will look into localObjects solution, this might lead to less concurr=
ency problems...=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0ADa: Em=
anuele Maiarelli <evvdrak@yahoo.it>=0AA: user@cayenne.apache.org; reinout@g=
mail.com=0AInviato: Mercoled=EC 22 luglio 2009, 15:56:59=0AOggetto: Re: Dif=
ferent DataContext=0A=0AYou welcome Reinout,=0A=0A    I'm not familiar with=
 Apache Wicket, and honeslty i'd like frameworks will handle all ThreadLoca=
l/contexts issues... =0Aand in the case of Wicket im not sure if there's a =
better way than the one i suggested=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A________________=
________________=0ADa: Reinout van Schouwen <reinout@gmail.com>=0AA: user@c=
ayenne.apache.org=0AInviato: Mercoled=EC 22 luglio 2009, 15:47:01=0AOggetto=
: Re: Different DataContext=0A=0AHi,=0A=0A2009/7/22 Mike Kienenberger <mkie=
nenb@gmail.com>:=0A> If you know that Person is not in a modified state, yo=
u can make a=0A> local copy of Person in your nameObj's data context.=0A=0A=
Thanks, Mike and Emanuele, getting the object context from the nameObj=0Ain=
deed solves the problem.=0A=0AIs this something to be aware of at all times=
? I.e. when creating a=0Alink between two objects, is it best practice to r=
etrieve the=0Adatacontext from either one, and handle both objects from tha=
t=0Acontext?=0A=0A-- =0AReinout van Schouwen=0Ahttp://vanschouwen.info/=0A=
=0A=0A      
--0-1051189566-1248272015=:69697--