cayenne-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrus Adamchik <>
Subject Re: DbGenerator vs. MergeContext
Date Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:25:06 GMT

On Aug 22, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Tore Halset wrote:

> On Aug 22, 2008, at 13:36, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> Interesting... I am not using either for anything complex lately,  
>> preferring manual SQL scripts executed with dbpatch Ant task, so I  
>> am a bit out of the loop.
> The sql-scripts is a very solid way to work, but some people would  
> probably prefer the ease of the modeler for such tasks. The merger  
> is also very good for verifying that your model and database is in  
> sync.

Totally agree. I just posted that to explain my own ignorance :-)

>> I would also love to have less redundancy and drop DbGenerator at a  
>> point when there is a complete and more powerful replacement.
> Merge call DbGenerator where DbGenerator has the needed  
> functionality. The reason for this is to save code and testing. It  
> could easily be refactored when we are happy with the merger.

Excellent. I'll keep that in mind.


View raw message