Mailing-List: contact user-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@cayenne.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-Id: <C6177205-41D6-461E-AE93-2ED569CD71E3@objectstyle.org>
From: Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>
To: user@cayenne.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <9cc55f600711221739y75045647p37205f0f131621f1@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915)
Subject: Re: ExtendedType and IN operator
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:42:00 +0200
References: <9cc55f600711221739y75045647p37205f0f131621f1@mail.gmail.com>

Chris,

I vaguely remember this being a problem in the past and us fixing  
it... I couldn't find any references via Google (having "IN" as a  
keyword doesn't help). So could you post the code that builds the  
query and the exact Cayenne version.

Thanks
Andrus


On Nov 23, 2007, at 3:39 AM, Chris Gamache wrote:

> I'm using Cayenne2 and PostgreSQL.
>
> For any single R-value in a where clause, my ExtendedType is working
> wonderfully. But! If I create an expression which uses the operator
> IN, my ExtendedType doesn't seem to get called. In the query logger
> everything looks okay, but pgjdbc complains in the same way that it
> would if there were no exended type. That leads me to believe either
> that Cayenne is ignoring ExtendedTypes when it does the JDBC binding
> for the R-value list, or that I've left out a detail in my
> ExtendedType class which is the culprit. I can post my ExtendedType
> code and some code that misbehaves. Will that suffice, or would you
> need more?
>
> CG
>