cayenne-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>
Subject Re: commitChanges() doesn't imply commit in db ?
Date Sun, 08 Apr 2007 13:36:58 GMT

On Apr 4, 2007, at 5:27 AM, jerome moliere wrote:

> (I 'm using the JTDS driver now)
> one big difference is that now : cayenne uses the generic db  
> adapter because
> the JDBC driver doesn't understand the meta data returned from db...

FYI - this is fixed in 1.2, 2.0 and 3.0 branches per CAY-775 issue in  
Jira.

Andrus


Mime
View raw message