Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 9348 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2007 13:39:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2007 13:39:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 6243 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2007 13:39:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-user-archive@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 6231 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2007 13:39:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cayenne.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 6222 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2007 13:39:37 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:39:36 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.210.96.236] (HELO byaroza.objectstyle.org) (207.210.96.236) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:39:27 -0800 Received: (qmail 22637 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2007 13:39:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ??b?????IPv6:::1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Mar 2007 13:39:06 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <49D23F7404DC5B4086D7352312597E0FD2680E@FNHH-SVMEXDB002.Freenet-AG.de> References: <49D23F7404DC5B4086D7352312597E0FD2680E@FNHH-SVMEXDB002.Freenet-AG.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Andrus Adamchik Subject: Re: AW: Help: getting NPE at ObjectStoreGraphDiff.preprocess Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:39:04 +0200 To: user@cayenne.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mar 7, 2007, at 9:19 AM, Peter Schr=F6der wrote: > i am not quite sure, but i think that you have to use > > context.createAndRegister(MyType.class); > > instead of > > context.newObject(MyType.class); No, the two are equivalent. In fact the first (older) form is =20 deprecated in 3.0 Andrus