cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nikita Timofeev <ntimof...@objectstyle.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Cayenne 4.2.M1 release
Date Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:10:22 GMT
That's not a big effort to prepare a fresh release, it getting faster
each time :).
So I think I could do it one more time.

As for the issue, the fix seems straightforward, so I'll just go for it.

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 4:30 AM John Huss <johnthuss@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would be fine with fixing it up and remaking the release, but I don’t
> know how much of a hassle that is. I can find time to fix AutoAdapter in
> the next two days I think.
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:34 PM Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Been thinking more about this... This breaks basic commit operations for
> > both Derby and SQLServer, making it a major issue. We've never shipped
> > releases with known bugs like this, even milestones. On the other hand
> > there is a workaround - use an explicit adapter.
> >
> > I am voting -0, which means that I wouldn't release it like that, but I
> > don't want to veto the release either. If the majority decides we should
> > proceed, so be it.
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Michael Gentry <blacknext@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Andrus,
> > >
> > > Given this is a milestone release, I think it is fine to release with the
> > > AutoAdapter issue.  These releases aren't required or expected to be
> > > production-ready, although that would certainly be nice.  They are for
> > > finding issues needing to be addressed, and you have.  :-)
> > >
> > > mrg
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 5:24 AM Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> So looks like this will affect users of Derby and SQLServer who are also
> > >> using the AutoAdapter (don't know if anyone still NOT using the
> > >> AutoAdapter?). I suppose we can still release the M1, though it will
> > not be
> > >> usable for me unfortunately until this is fixed.
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts?
> > >>
> > >> Andrus
> > >>
> > >>> On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:40 AM, Nikita Timofeev <
> > ntimofeev@objectstyle.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi Andrus,
> > >>>
> > >>> Yes, LinkMove problems related to batch generated keys. The problem
is
> > >>> with AutoAdapter, it simply doesn't define
> > >>> supportsGeneratedKeysForBatchInserts() method.
> > >>> DerbyAdapter itself works fine.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:47 AM Andrus Adamchik <
> > andrus@objectstyle.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Still testing the release... As expected 4.2 is no longer a drop-in
> > >> replacement of 4.0 for either Agrest or LinkMove (because of the
> > Property
> > >> class refactoring). So I made a few tweaks to LM to make it compile [1].
> > >> Now I am getting the following error on commit in a bunch of tests (e.g.
> > >> CreateIT) [2].
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Is this related to 57332e865f5dabb9c7adef4bac9a61137f6828c4 (batch
> > mode
> > >> and PKs on Derby) ?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> (Derby version used in tests is 10.14.2.0 - the latest that supports
> > >> Java 8)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Andrus
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Apr 7, 2020, at 2:03 PM, Nikita Timofeev <
> > ntimofeev@objectstyle.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Here is another try for the Cayenne 4.2.M1 release.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Release notes:
> > >> https://github.com/apache/cayenne/blob/4.2.M1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> > >>>>> Maven repo:
> > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-1038/
> > >>>>> Assemblies: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/4.2.M1/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>> Nikita Timofeev
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1] https://github.com/nhl/link-move/tree/cayenne-4.2 <
> > >> https://github.com/nhl/link-move/tree/cayenne-4.2>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [2]  org.apache.cayenne.CayenneRuntimeException: [v.4.2.M1 Apr
07 2020
> > >> 09:32:02] Mismatching number of generated PKs: expected 2, instead got
1
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.FlushObserver.nextGeneratedRows(FlushObserver.java:77)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNodeQueryAction$1.nextGeneratedRows(DataNodeQueryAction.java:77)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.jdbc.BatchAction.processGeneratedKeys(BatchAction.java:288)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.jdbc.BatchAction.runAsBatch(BatchAction.java:133)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.jdbc.BatchAction.performAction(BatchAction.java:94)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNodeQueryAction.runQuery(DataNodeQueryAction.java:97)
> > >>>> at
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNode.performQueries(DataNode.java:273)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.lambda$executeQueries$6(DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.java:175)
> > >>>> at java.util.HashMap.forEach(HashMap.java:1288)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.executeQueries(DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.java:174)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.flush(DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.java:89)
> > >>>> at
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onSyncFlush(DataDomain.java:637)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onSyncNoFilters(DataDomain.java:609)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain$DataDomainSyncFilterChain.onSync(DataDomain.java:835)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.tx.TransactionFilter.lambda$onSync$0(TransactionFilter.java:61)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager$BaseTransactionHandler.performInTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:180)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager$BaseTransactionHandler.performInNewTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:152)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager$NestedTransactionHandler.handle(DefaultTransactionManager.java:95)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager.performInTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:62)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager.performInTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:40)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.tx.TransactionFilter.onSync(TransactionFilter.java:61)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain$DataDomainSyncFilterChain.onSync(DataDomain.java:834)
> > >>>> at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onSync(DataDomain.java:596)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.flushToParent(DataContext.java:737)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.commitChanges(DataContext.java:686)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateSegmentProcessor.commitTarget(CreateSegmentProcessor.java:63)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateSegmentProcessor.process(CreateSegmentProcessor.java:44)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateTask.lambda$createBatchProcessor$1(CreateTask.java:72)
> > >>>> at com.nhl.link.move.batch.BatchRunner.run(BatchRunner.java:57)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateTask.doRun(CreateTask.java:62)
> > >>>> at com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.BaseTask.run(BaseTask.java:46)
> > >>>> at com.nhl.link.move.LmTask.run(LmTask.java:31)
> > >>>> at com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.BaseTask.run(BaseTask.java:39)
> > >>>> at com.nhl.link.move.LmTask.run(LmTask.java:19)
> > >>>> at com.nhl.link.move.itest.CreateIT.testSync(CreateIT.java:24)
> > >>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> > >>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> > >>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> > >>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> > >>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> > >>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> > >>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> > >>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> > >>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
> > >>>> at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:160)
> > >>>> at
> > >>
> > com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:68)
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>> Nikita Timofeev
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >



-- 
Best regards,
Nikita Timofeev

Mime
View raw message