cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Cayenne 4.2.M1 release
Date Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:33:57 GMT
Been thinking more about this... This breaks basic commit operations for both Derby and SQLServer,
making it a major issue. We've never shipped releases with known bugs like this, even milestones.
On the other hand there is a workaround - use an explicit adapter.

I am voting -0, which means that I wouldn't release it like that, but I don't want to veto
the release either. If the majority decides we should proceed, so be it.

Andrus


> On Apr 13, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Michael Gentry <blacknext@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Andrus,
> 
> Given this is a milestone release, I think it is fine to release with the
> AutoAdapter issue.  These releases aren't required or expected to be
> production-ready, although that would certainly be nice.  They are for
> finding issues needing to be addressed, and you have.  :-)
> 
> mrg
> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 5:24 AM Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> So looks like this will affect users of Derby and SQLServer who are also
>> using the AutoAdapter (don't know if anyone still NOT using the
>> AutoAdapter?). I suppose we can still release the M1, though it will not be
>> usable for me unfortunately until this is fixed.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>>> On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:40 AM, Nikita Timofeev <ntimofeev@objectstyle.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Andrus,
>>> 
>>> Yes, LinkMove problems related to batch generated keys. The problem is
>>> with AutoAdapter, it simply doesn't define
>>> supportsGeneratedKeysForBatchInserts() method.
>>> DerbyAdapter itself works fine.
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:47 AM Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Still testing the release... As expected 4.2 is no longer a drop-in
>> replacement of 4.0 for either Agrest or LinkMove (because of the Property
>> class refactoring). So I made a few tweaks to LM to make it compile [1].
>> Now I am getting the following error on commit in a bunch of tests (e.g.
>> CreateIT) [2].
>>>> 
>>>> Is this related to 57332e865f5dabb9c7adef4bac9a61137f6828c4 (batch mode
>> and PKs on Derby) ?
>>>> 
>>>> (Derby version used in tests is 10.14.2.0 - the latest that supports
>> Java 8)
>>>> 
>>>> Andrus
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 7, 2020, at 2:03 PM, Nikita Timofeev <ntimofeev@objectstyle.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here is another try for the Cayenne 4.2.M1 release.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Release notes:
>> https://github.com/apache/cayenne/blob/4.2.M1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>>>> Maven repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-1038/
>>>>> Assemblies: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/4.2.M1/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Nikita Timofeev
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> [1] https://github.com/nhl/link-move/tree/cayenne-4.2 <
>> https://github.com/nhl/link-move/tree/cayenne-4.2>
>>>> 
>>>> [2]  org.apache.cayenne.CayenneRuntimeException: [v.4.2.M1 Apr 07 2020
>> 09:32:02] Mismatching number of generated PKs: expected 2, instead got 1
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.FlushObserver.nextGeneratedRows(FlushObserver.java:77)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNodeQueryAction$1.nextGeneratedRows(DataNodeQueryAction.java:77)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.access.jdbc.BatchAction.processGeneratedKeys(BatchAction.java:288)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.access.jdbc.BatchAction.runAsBatch(BatchAction.java:133)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.access.jdbc.BatchAction.performAction(BatchAction.java:94)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNodeQueryAction.runQuery(DataNodeQueryAction.java:97)
>>>> at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNode.performQueries(DataNode.java:273)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.lambda$executeQueries$6(DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.java:175)
>>>> at java.util.HashMap.forEach(HashMap.java:1288)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.executeQueries(DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.java:174)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.flush(DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.java:89)
>>>> at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onSyncFlush(DataDomain.java:637)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onSyncNoFilters(DataDomain.java:609)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain$DataDomainSyncFilterChain.onSync(DataDomain.java:835)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.tx.TransactionFilter.lambda$onSync$0(TransactionFilter.java:61)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager$BaseTransactionHandler.performInTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:180)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager$BaseTransactionHandler.performInNewTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:152)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager$NestedTransactionHandler.handle(DefaultTransactionManager.java:95)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager.performInTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:62)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager.performInTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:40)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.tx.TransactionFilter.onSync(TransactionFilter.java:61)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain$DataDomainSyncFilterChain.onSync(DataDomain.java:834)
>>>> at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onSync(DataDomain.java:596)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.flushToParent(DataContext.java:737)
>>>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.commitChanges(DataContext.java:686)
>>>> at
>> com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateSegmentProcessor.commitTarget(CreateSegmentProcessor.java:63)
>>>> at
>> com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateSegmentProcessor.process(CreateSegmentProcessor.java:44)
>>>> at
>> com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateTask.lambda$createBatchProcessor$1(CreateTask.java:72)
>>>> at com.nhl.link.move.batch.BatchRunner.run(BatchRunner.java:57)
>>>> at
>> com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateTask.doRun(CreateTask.java:62)
>>>> at com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.BaseTask.run(BaseTask.java:46)
>>>> at com.nhl.link.move.LmTask.run(LmTask.java:31)
>>>> at com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.BaseTask.run(BaseTask.java:39)
>>>> at com.nhl.link.move.LmTask.run(LmTask.java:19)
>>>> at com.nhl.link.move.itest.CreateIT.testSync(CreateIT.java:24)
>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>> at
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>> at
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>> at
>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>>>> at
>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>>>> at
>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>>>> at
>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>>>> at
>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
>>>> at
>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
>>>> at
>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
>>>> at
>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
>>>> at
>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
>>>> at
>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
>>>> at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:160)
>>>> at
>> com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:68)
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Nikita Timofeev
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message