Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF27920050F for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:54:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id DDE3F160A27; Tue, 24 May 2016 10:54:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 31F10160A01 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:54:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 64746 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2016 10:54:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 64732 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2016 10:54:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 10:54:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 571AD1A0A17 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 10:54:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.821 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.821 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=objectstyle.org header.b=N3IgQ99G; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=R82wXv2a Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HUii7Ejzddi8 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 10:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id DDAE55F59E for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 10:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2282137B for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:54:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 24 May 2016 06:54:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=objectstyle.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=rc6FzjraUXwVC7APZ6JlRh59qSs=; b=N3IgQ9 9G2XR6fDn7Uz01rs4w9ap50BEOhUh2UxbSXgoQf6aroCiw1eRjT+Gpiya+Vpvopu f7/e8A53TDInp4kFT6YvLhlnEdQEawp4JA3TWGBvTbPjy06bjB4y3ZmnFZtaaIt4 yAlVsnk+Rk5kjFy2hRi4OM/LDci8icdJ6OaFE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=rc6FzjraUXwVC7A PZ6JlRh59qSs=; b=R82wXv2aE/hKXTxCpW4Gq/hhZS1eI4ezvVXbdNd8GDIRYhQ A+N9m4smxBhwrNvs0tgjKr0WoA9aYUk6UEymsZiu8T5Ni/7dat+09N6/AaFFh6Zb nuxNQ2EzmaChZ813Gm16ApyoQkiAZ/CbCxgTaa6zfs+1tCYaLG2gjDPB9wVY= X-Sasl-enc: AznIB9E76KwasXhQK3oEpnQq35TW6W+akym+fDXex1X/ 1464087242 Received: from [192.168.1.30] (unknown [37.17.49.228]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A5779CCD3C for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:54:02 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: Travis errors, Was: 4.0 jenkins build failures From: Andrus Adamchik In-Reply-To: <21f772bd-ce19-7d25-7828-bb706fdf827f@maniatis.org> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 13:54:01 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <7fd85297-bd1d-89a9-d46e-6b38e34b0cb9@maniatis.org> <6a9e8553-305a-98ee-9792-81dbdf51d69d@maniatis.org> <493DF267-7E4F-45E3-A685-C592B74849AD@objectstyle.org> <85af0556-5e9b-a364-e5fc-85ed6996613f@maniatis.org> <880D7786-536C-4B53-9194-A2F3F0AF76A6@objectstyle.org> <1E685AFE-3D7A-4192-B26D-C66A9671EEA7@objectstyle.org> <81CFE747-F911-4879-A9C2-CA400343038E@objectstyle.org> <81503414-cf7c-72e7-d75d-5e38430689a4@maniatis.org> <17374AEC-49A1-4498-98D6-C4F7BB799C54@objectstyle.org> <4b45418c-460b-fae8-3acb-fa0ffe34798c@maniatis.org> <86FBF691-015F-4A42-B1D2-C489162CAD29@objectstyle.org> <02677d3c-f7af-53fa-fa21-8adf1ddc2d86@maniatis.org> <21f772bd-ce19-7d25-7828-bb706fdf827f@maniatis.org> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) archived-at: Tue, 24 May 2016 10:54:09 -0000 > On May 24, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Aristedes Maniatis = wrote: >=20 > Perfect. I've actually never used slf4j, but I think that log4j might = be easier to use and better documented.=20 See my other email. The difference between the two is that SLF is = code-facing API that is easy to bridge to anything (including Log4J), = and Log4J is an advanced logger implementation that is better kept away = from the API. Andrus=