Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.0.M3 second attempt
From: Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAAWAmOdNjxyERtL_nFx=36=v2MNVYz3JxpG2Ma94rU_0J2BAQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 23:15:21 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9A31267E-7AFE-48B0-8A87-C476AD1FED8D@objectstyle.org>
References: 
 <CAAWAmOdNjxyERtL_nFx=36=v2MNVYz3JxpG2Ma94rU_0J2BAQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@cayenne.apache.org

Here is my checklist:

1. MD5 matches
2. Signature checks
3. rat passes
4. builds from source
5. Modeler runs on OS X=20
5. Modeler runs on Windows
6. cayenne-java8.jar is now present in assembly
7. Maven artifacts: I switched link-rest, link-move, bootique projects =
locally to the staging Maven repo below. Test suites form each of the =
projects succeeded 100%.
8. None of the newly uncovered unit test issues are critical. And there =
are now Jiras for them. I don't think any of them are blockers.

So, I am +1.

Andrus


> On Feb 8, 2016, at 9:00 PM, Savva Kolbachev <s.kolbachev@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> Hi All,
> I've added java8 module to the assembly and switched assembly module
> to the cayenne-java8-module-to-build
> profile. So assembly module now requires Java 8. Also I've added .idea
> directory to the exclusions.
>=20
> Maven artifacts:
> =
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-1009
> Assemblies: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/4.0.M3/
>=20
> Tests:
> =
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sLR2CykqZSoPU2WdQaKKcp4rLgwja4fmPEOvYw=
5zZgc/edit?usp=3Dsharing
>=20
> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>=20
> --=20
> Thanks and Regards
> Savva Kolbachev