Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAM1yOjav7tBfeU_Y6s-5FQAwqa3Yge2AVW9+biUNb=3D6vYc4Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAA-upzqaFTBJd5jcPyj38nUkTAsZZwSfkQsQ+UE-+jzAdXkjcQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <568C44F2.6090702@maniatis.org>
 <CAM1yOjav7tBfeU_Y6s-5FQAwqa3Yge2AVW9+biUNb=3D6vYc4Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:48:52 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAA-upzorg2=+fJ3OXqpMw5zCTG96LVVjb-piAFnZTNgN-EG4hw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CM Thoughts
To: Cayenne Developers <dev@cayenne.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3aed6aa5ded05290f33fa

--001a11c3aed6aa5ded05290f33fa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I've thought a bit about creating a Tapestry/Web version of CM in the past
and it always seemed like it would be just a bit too cumbersome to
launch/secure.  I'm not sure if a JFX/JS version would be any simpler or if
it would even have value over a straight Electron version.


On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ari@maniatis.org>
> wrote:
>
> > To my mind, there is only a small gain in moving away from Swing and
> quite a bit of work. But if you had the time to put into it, JavaFX is most
> likely to survive another 15 years from the options you give above.
>
> It appears that JavaFx is also usable from javascript, which might be
> another reason to use it -- maybe the modeler could run on a web page.
>   No idea if that is really practical though as I have never tried
> anything like that.
>
>
> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/scripting/nashorn/javafx.html
>

--001a11c3aed6aa5ded05290f33fa--