Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEF5518F21 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87862 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2016 13:56:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 87836 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2016 13:56:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 87824 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2016 13:56:10 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 13:56:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id AD11BC1A73 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:56:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.002 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[AC_DIV_BONANZA=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=masslight-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gvXiyuke7kiW for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 4C0B6203BD for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id f206so23829817wmf.0 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 05:55:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=masslight-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=HJTkYb0AG6F3r+Au4+jT8ktNtmSDu15nQjBu1Wkp07M=; b=dqiKQiK6ZHgiBkxaM0xVhdWHNn91sUpP04c7a4V6Okrk7ObPn04N2kHlx5RSBWkSi7 uA8kXiJ3vmYfLIXgue53N0d53a8pQQ5O+y4aCq05G3oEeOR++AN9LJwf+5F5e+1tYFN7 M70Kl1NbRbedn7YbhMD5KPWS7yfBqs6q0XrHR0yeXp5G+BFvU95AplrdYZQ1CB/EPAdQ BRsuNWt5lV4z5JspJLFDkqpx3UWJEJ5npvdwXafjR/oPsuYd2+wAOdGd+dGojpEgjqCH ggUdemnJuwZF5gFXBgnP/GjvW8ZGbUzTZab8E+2xWWL/X8ayr9tE8T0ZESQX9AQxZkzm B2EQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=HJTkYb0AG6F3r+Au4+jT8ktNtmSDu15nQjBu1Wkp07M=; b=EXRV8roaGR+c0WdXT3tBXKDQ6OnzVVsqMlGDPzA5okSxrpkQR3XPEZaIITQMrjUvP4 RVXIwAe7iShQpFoLEraALsIeAnbeJQmJUr3iAxXFGm8z4joCn+tlOG+NoWNjKeNGS6Ad 9J+xqUkT/en6VbDsiKgbtsShzbw7aRn7W2uK8yLCjzT7bWiJ3ATOLiLLLvGsRRv451Vp zmWtzXnNmPleEYQaDIg/kTGdb60XXNl1s/s2cr/YlkuY2jKTnh1cSs5xpDdzG2zWk2S+ rK4HIyFvWUkc2vhpc3rn0SqK7uD4JwrFndVZ6DrBk2X76i36PiQVaqTr0hUI6YXeZpq+ 7jfg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlS/24A2ghE8bCF1BfWnjF386sQXOknSvVgLOaYmhga4aKQyIWS7PLIjhpI+FDyPq7qn7yKke++6F27YgfqbaoxH/Pxeg== X-Received: by 10.194.94.138 with SMTP id dc10mr14099597wjb.37.1452002157888; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 05:55:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.55.208 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 05:55:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Michael Gentry Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 08:55:38 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CM Thoughts To: Cayenne Developers Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb03d4ed5ad9c052896981e --047d7bb03d4ed5ad9c052896981e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I'll add another one I forgot about! :-) Possibly merge the ObjEntity and DbEntity in the left-hand navigation pane. I'm not exactly sure what it would look like, but I know EOModeler and WOLips have a combined navigation pane: http://cdn-ak.f.st-hatena.com/images/fotolife/m/mig50/20060731/20060731010550.png On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Michael Gentry wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to start a conversation about future improvements for CM. > > My current wish list: > > - Java Entities > - Class Level: > - Ability to add extra imports. > - Ability to add interfaces implemented. > - Ability to add JavaDoc. > - Ability to add annotations. > - Attribute Level: > - Ability to add JavaDoc. > - Ability to add annotations. > - Relationship Level: > - Ability to add JavaDoc. > - Ability to add annotations. > - Ability to drill-down through relationships.* > - DB Entities > - Table Level: > - Ability to add comments (for DBs that support comments). > - Column Level: > - Ability to add comments (for DBs that support comments). > - Relationship Level: > - Ability to add comments (for DBs that support comments). > - Ability to drill-down through relationships.* > > * Llike EOModeler, in the left-hand navigation pane. You could keep > expanding the relationship tree to expose other entities/relationships. > > > We've also previously chatted a bit about if we even want to keep > maintaining the current form of CM. If we did want to overhaul the > implementation, what route should we go? > > - JFX (Seems like Oracle's ugly stepchild and I question their commitment > to it.) > - SWT > - Eclipse Plugin (The WOLips route.) > - Electron (Used by Atom and Visual Studio Code, among others.) > > > Your thoughts greatly appreciated! > > > Thanks, > > mrg > > --047d7bb03d4ed5ad9c052896981e--