cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aristedes Maniatis <...@maniatis.org>
Subject Re: Change audit framework
Date Tue, 22 Sep 2015 21:58:47 GMT
On 23/09/2015 5:57am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>     // optionally can take a changeset serialized to JSON
>     @PostCommit
>     void processAsJSON(Map<ObjectId, String> map) {..}

Why would you perform this serialisation for the user and not just supply a piece of sample
code to put into the listener. Yes, json is the flavour of the day, but some people will want
separate bits of json for every object, others will want to try and assemble the whole commit
tree into one json string, others will want to do something else. Why would Cayenne itself
have an opinion on this format?

There are very few other places where Cayenne specifies the data format, Hessian being the
only one I can think of.



My other question is about what objects will be found in the change set. Right now, if you
modify an object, listeners can be fired on objects at the other end of its relations, even
if no FK or other changes will be made in the database to those other objects. Do you anticipate
the change set in the audit will include these kinds of related records, or only ones where
a database attribute change is made?


This is a very nice feature for Cayenne

Ari




-- 
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Mime
View raw message