Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2040817B9E for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 01:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13349 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2014 01:31:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 13338 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2014 01:31:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 13324 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2014 01:31:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 01:31:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.217.174] (HELO mail-lb0-f174.google.com) (209.85.217.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 01:31:38 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id p9so7140552lbv.5 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:31:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=IOi3GnKwPr2hkpwaZp+1O1omZa4m84RIYMdPdp361ug=; b=bVM+LhHbE+tYpde1FI2Chi5vJurWkS86S+LZ8W11G6x1nJXUOHYrsjC71D8lEH32Ec c5NF5iusWbgljH8KcrWyoGpaj9NQST9gnmqYxoAFq+N+B49U60JfDK8kjIJHzMeAvkKj Y9z/ID7of/0jRrUZ7lQVPT1faVowtnlX7vKCzQuVLfGcZRo3RwJmqI+BwD71ZfICJcIT HM0wuWFJyUsYsB5p/QefnlwJQZ+gH9g6j7bdTnk43aihGJatW4QE2wXE2NprqFFw1k9G Xdaf1BiU+ZrK9LuR2s0GFx1LAeuN0elykbptFylZoPhFfC5Wf+WSDRemzMVCwEWOtAyG Btzw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlO3+AYRjXvMvJBWB+7ANnTOLK8L5vLZBNMqN8hRbHV5xo05yd3PvuFsMYRwzDdBJP1dWkW X-Received: by 10.153.7.134 with SMTP id dc6mr7931513lad.9.1412731876575; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:31:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.21.132 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:30:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54346CCB.9030604@maniatis.org> References: <4C8D7FB8-12BC-402E-97EE-31F2F02064B3@objectstyle.org> <54346CCB.9030604@maniatis.org> From: Michael Gentry Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:30:56 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Chainable SelectQuery To: Cayenne Developers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: >> That said, if returning this is the direction we're going, then really all >> the currently void methods in SelectQuery should do the same thing - like >> addOrdering for example. > > > Correct, but we also need to gracefully deprecate the old methods and make new fluent ones. I was looking at the changes and was wondering if we really need to deprecate the old methods. Can't setFetchLimit() live along with limit()? Thanks, mrg