cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aristedes Maniatis <...@maniatis.org>
Subject Re: 3.2 -> 4
Date Thu, 09 Oct 2014 23:05:12 GMT
I think our parallel discussion about fluent API is very relevant here. People using 3.2 milestones
before even the first beta will cope with a version change. And a big API update is exactly
the time to release a major new version number.

A number is just a label, but it says something about us and about the product.

Release: 3.0M1
Date: 17 Jul 2007

Not only is it about time after 7 years to move to the next whole number, but not moving says
a lot about lack of progress which isn't reflected in the reality of actual features.


Ari


On 2/10/2014 6:36am, John Huss wrote:
> I agreed with sticking with 3.2.  Since there isn't a major architecture
> change 3.2 seems appropriate.  The smaller version change makes it seem
> less scary to people considering upgrading.
> 
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> After this amount of time, I think renaming it will cause confusion
>> when projects which are currently running 3.2 pre-final find no
>> further 3.2 upgrades in the future.
>>
>> And we've set a new precedent with 3.0 and 3.1, so I think we're ok
>> continuing down this this path.
>>
>>
>> But I don't feel strongly enough that I'd vote against it.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>
>> wrote:
>>> There were some suggestions to rename 3.2 release to just 4. I think
>> this is a good idea, as historically each of our GA release was always a
>> major thing. No matter whether we incremented the version by 1 or by 0.1.
>> So just throwing this in here for a lazy consensus.
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>
> 

-- 
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Mime
View raw message