Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7A1611820 for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 01:12:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17362 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2014 01:06:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 17292 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2014 01:06:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 17211 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2014 01:06:09 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 May 2014 01:06:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [49.50.240.20] (HELO mail.simplehost.co.nz) (49.50.240.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 May 2014 01:06:05 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on apollo.simplehost.co.nz X-Spam-Level: Message-ID: <5372C15F.4040104@lindesay.co.nz> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 13:05:35 +1200 From: Andrew Lindesay MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Subject: Re: CAY-1932 for 3.2 Next Milestone Release References: <5371E38F.3000003@lindesay.co.nz> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RECEIVED, NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Hi Andrus; Thanks for applying the patch. Good point on the floats and doubles; maybe I can take a look at that at some point. Regards; On 13/05/14 11:33 pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > Applied. Thanks a lot for the patch. I can think of a possible enhancement - handling of floats and doubles. IIRC we can parse those (?) > Also I�ve been considering for some time to support date/time literals. After all there�s ISO8601 format that is well understaood and easy to parse. Something we may add to both Expression and EJBQL parsers. -- Andrew Lindesay